Here's the YouTube livestream link to watch the Board of Supervisors meeting this morning.
I think it will be interesting to see what the public interest would be that they identify. Since development agreements are not uncommon it’s difficult to argue that the existence of the development agreement itself is against public interest. If they somehow won that argument then I would think 2 and 3 would result in the whole contract being void. If they more narrowly define the issue with this particular contract then when you get to 2 that could be a problem and even if they get to step 3 it would likely only lead to a partial cancel of the contract.US Trust Co vs New Jersey suggested a three-part test for a state to invalidate a contract to which it's a party:
ETA Context: IIRC, the canonical example is from some landfill dumping contract in Maine. The state awarded a contract to a company to dump waste in the landfill. Later the state enacted legislation prohibiting the dumping of ... I think it was radioactive waste? ... in landfills. The company sued but the law was upheld. I think the company got minimal damages.
- The state has to identify a specific, compelling public interest
- There has to be no other "less drastic" way for the state to achieve the same goal
- Only the smallest part of the contract that conflicts with that specific goal can be voided
It's worth asking if SB 1604 contains all three of the elements identified in US Trust. I've read it and I don't think it addresses any of them.
I think parts of US Trust were re-examined later in the 2nd Circuit, but we're in the 11th, and I don't think there's been a later case that took up US Trust in the 11th. I could be wrong.
Michael Sasso, aka "" from the CFTODB spent the weekend at the Magic Kingdom. This will surely annoy dear old Bridget.
Michael Sasso, aka " from the CFTODB spent the weekend at the Magic Kingdom. This will surely annoy dear old Bridget.
Conducting monorail research
Wonder if he paid for a full priced 1 day ticket.
Wonder if he paid for a full priced 1 day ticket.
Michael Sasso, aka "" from the CFTODB spent the weekend at the Magic Kingdom. This will surely annoy dear old Bridget.
I assume he was just at the park as a tourist. If he was doing anything in an official capacity he probably should have been looking at roads and bridges, inspecting sewers, visiting the power stations or visiting the preserved wetlands they want to develop on. The district has little to do with day to day park operations so no reason to visit the theme parks as a board member.In all seriousness, this is probably a good thing.
We know that the reason these people were appointed was for political gamesmanship, but it would be a good thing if any of them decided that they should ACTUALLY do a good job with the responsibility they've been given.
Was telling that they're also mentioning that customers have said they're worried about the friction.Rainforest Cafe/T-Rex/BOATHOUSE at the CFTOB meeting! Let's see what their concern is.
ETA: It seems like they're remining the board that talk of additional taxes, fees, and regulations will impact businesses in the district other than Disney.
Next up are small-business owners from Disney Springs: Splitsville, Homecomin', and Everglazed. Reminding the board that small businesses are impacted by the board. They employ 450 people, according to the speaker, and pay $3M in property and sales taxes.
Right, that's my point.I assume he was just at the park as a tourist. If he was doing anything in an official capacity he probably should have been looking at roads and bridges, inspecting sewers, visiting the power stations or visiting the preserved wetlands they want to develop on. The district has little to do with day to day park operations so no reason to visit the theme parks as a board member.
Restaurant owners at Disney Springs voice concerns about threats of raising taxes by the new governing district
Restaurant owners at Walt Disney World voice concerns about threats of raising taxes by the new governing district
Restaurant owners at Walt Disney World voice concerns about threats of raising taxes by the new governing districtwww.wdwmagic.com
I think you would be correct.I have a feeling that Ron could are less as long as his vendetta against Disney rages on.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.