Stripes
Premium Member
That pertains to the development agreement, not RCID itself.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District
- Thread starter castlecake2.0
- Start date
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
Most of the responsibility would fall to the municipalities. The problem with the dissolution plan was that it dropped assets and liabilities onto the pre-existing jurisdictions. Because the Reedy Creek Drainage District was create before the cities, that made the counties the pre-existing jurisdictions. The existence of the cities then prevented the counties from doing things like setting up taxing districts to generate the funds. Powers like land use, building oversight and emergency services would have still been held by the cities.
Last edited:
flynnibus
Premium Member
It’s only proof that disney was involved- which was already known
The point about optics is not in itself anything actionable. Even the presenter noted this and was only using it to support another argument.
Lobbyists write most bills which are rebranded in the same way by staff.
My biggest take away was they outlined several vectors they would attack the soundness of the deal… but without much ranking of which are actually winnable.
But now disney lawyers have a nice list of points to prepare for
Mr. Stay Puft
Well-Known Member
But even not doing so doesn't necessarily mean the contract becomes null and void. I'd think a reasonable judge would allow RCID/Disney to remedy that oversight in good faith.
CaptainAmerica
Premium Member
They never claimed it was on the charter.
The charter says "pursuant to [statute XYZ]," and that statute is what had the 30 year term.
If you have a law that says "every charter of this nature has a term of 30 years" then it doesn't matter if the charter itself says anything about 30 years.
Kamikaze
Well-Known Member
Which is something we already knew - 30 years minimum, but Royal Lives Clause and/or perpetuity maximum.
Batman'sParents
Active Member
At what point will Disney and the new District Board start to work behind the scenes on crafting a compromise package between both sides? Surely this has already started?
Ligation is an option, but wouldn't both sides prefer to try to work out their issues to get this out of the news cycle? The RCID was boring for 50 years, I like to go back to that.
Ligation is an option, but wouldn't both sides prefer to try to work out their issues to get this out of the news cycle? The RCID was boring for 50 years, I like to go back to that.
That sounds like a personal issue. You might want to get checked out.
I do not want to know how you get through the Rise or Guardians lines...........
Kamikaze
Well-Known Member
Its actually from the Dev Agreement: https://blogmickey.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/2023-02-08-RCID-BOS-Package-FINAL_v2.pdf
So - not sure what that guys point was, 30 years from Feb is fine for this situation for now.
CaptainAmerica
Premium Member
DeSantis wants it *in* the news cycle, he doesn't want it resolved. I don't think he actually cares about the ultimate outcome (which will be years from now), but he wants the fight to be ongoing until the primary begins.
I think the people on this board really do care about the outcome and they actually want to screw Disney. They're doing it for their pound of flesh, they're not just doing it as a stunt.
Mr. Stay Puft
Well-Known Member
Now they're talking about regulating Disney's pools, another tool they'll use to extort Disney into making concessions to the state.
They're weaponizing regulation of business by the state to force Disney into complying with DeSantis/Republicans views. They want to force right wing social engineering on Disney using regulatory oversight. It couldn't be more obvious.
They're weaponizing regulation of business by the state to force Disney into complying with DeSantis/Republicans views. They want to force right wing social engineering on Disney using regulatory oversight. It couldn't be more obvious.
Mr. Stay Puft
Well-Known Member
I think he DOES care about the outcome. The only acceptable outcome is state control over Disney.
Stripes
Premium Member
The development agreement is subject to a 30 year maximum. The restrictive covenants are in effect in perpetuity or Royal lives clause.
Disney Analyst
Well-Known Member
Right, I meant RCID.
Tha Realest
Well-Known Member
Yes. The correction is that they can resubmit the contract with the required public notice under FL law.
Wendy Pleakley
Well-Known Member
Shout out to anyone with the patience to actually watch these proceedings.
Given the recaps of the DeSantis press conference, I can't imagine having the patience to listen to these people just lie for hours and hours.
Given the recaps of the DeSantis press conference, I can't imagine having the patience to listen to these people just lie for hours and hours.
scottieRoss
Well-Known Member
Massage Parlors at Disney. Are there more than at the Spa's or is there a secret one I can visit next trip? And how does it end
it ends with e-coli from water quality issues if you listen to that last presenter.