I don't believe Disney would be the responsible party for sending the notices; the district would be.That person did claim without a doubt that Disney did not send letters out.
Thoughts?
If true, this would seem to be a horrendously costly error, and something that is hard to believe could have happened.Sounds like letters never went out. Assuming that is true, that is highly, highly concerning.
If Disney sent letters out, surely they sent them using certified mail. Their lawyers couldn't be that incompetent could they?Sounds like letters never went out. Assuming that is true, that is highly, highly concerning.
Can't and won't happen. They would need to have a use for the land that can't be done with other state owned land.This is very concerning. Downright frightening.
Sounds to me the new board is going to try to force Disney into selling off assets under eminent domain to the state!
RCID was responsible for sending them out, not Disney.If Disney sent letters out, surely they sent them using certified mail. Their lawyers couldn't be that incompetent could they?
That's why you keep the tracking slip. Still an interesting development and not the last time hearing about this.If Disney sent letters out, surely they sent them using certified mail. Their lawyers couldn't be that incompetent could they?
Sounds like there's an argument to be made if they actually needed to send them out and to which parties if anyIf Disney sent letters out, surely they sent them using certified mail. Their lawyers couldn't be that incompetent could they?
But RCID has a legal department, they would likely have their lawyers overlook or sign-off on the notices I would think.RCID was responsible for sending them out, not Disney.
But knowing the magnitude of their importance, you would think Disney would have had people ensuring it happened.RCID was responsible for sending them out, not Disney.
Legally, the letters only have to go to the parties of the land that's being rezoned. That's only Disney. And maybe the District itself. They didn't change any zoning for land other landowners have.Sounds like letters never went out. Assuming that is true, that is highly, highly concerning.
Legal notification of the Development Agreement is required under FL's Sunshine Law. One of the Districts attorneys stated that it didn't happen.Can someone please sum up what the letters issue is all about? I'm having trouble finding it between patients.
So, you're saying if the current special district was eliminated and the counties needed to pay for all the services handled by the current special district, they would be forced to create new special districts to raise the funds necessary to pay for them?If Orange and Osceola Counties had to cover everything that Reedy Creek does, it wouldn't be the end of the world. Rather, they would have a similar situation to Universal. SeaWorld, and I-Drive. This means more special districts being created to help fund roads (like the CRA Universal is in) and permitting going through the county rather than the CFTOD/RCID.
Absolutely. And Disney/RCID absolutely knew about this requirement.But knowing the magnitude of their importance, you would think Disney would have had people ensuring it happened.
it’s required by the law that allows development agreements.Legal notification of the Development Agreement is required under FL's Sunshine Law. One of the Districts attorneys stated that it didn't happen.
I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say I don't really trust what the state side saysAbsolutely. And Disney/RCID absolutely knew about this requirement.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.