Disney Glimpses
Well-Known Member
You know what the best part of that is, all of the people in that YouTube circle still say that "everything went down exactly like he said it would." Literally nothing he said would happen has happened.
-
Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.
News Reedy Creek Improvement District and the Central Florida Tourism Oversight District
- Thread starter castlecake2.0
- Start date
flynnibus
Premium Member
Where you live has nothing to do with your intelligenc , knowledge, or a relevant reference for anything stated. So why do you keep bringing this up as if it makes you right or something ?
mikejs78
Premium Member
It has nothing to do with right or wrong or your opinion vs mine. It has to do with facts and evidence, which you have provided none while most of the people here have done their research, looking at actual Florida law, the original Reedy Creek act, and primary sources to have an intelligent discussion, not post sensationalist YouTube videos from someone who can't get their basic facts right.Been here since 2009…still need to listen to the “troll” comments. And the majority of you folks who are talking, have “liked“ my comments over the years.
Is everyone here a F’ing Disney apologist?
And what makes you right? And everyone else who agrees with you? Enlighten us…
lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
Sources, including primary sources, have been provided.
Your source previously claimed there was no issue with dissolution. This was clearly not true and why the state needed a do over to address the issue.
Here is one that is a good starting point:
Here’s another for recent issues:
mikejs78
Premium Member
There are a number of actual lawyers on this thread who have chimed in, and also others out there who have more credibility who have directly contradicted what this guy says. He's the only guy saying this stuff, and so far everything he's said in the last year about this subject has been wrong.Yeah, I’m not a lawyer. But everyone here has an agenda. You want to side with people who are on your side of the fence. Actual lawyers, who you all talk
Again…how’s Disney’s bottom line doing? I honestly don’t care either way at this point…
Thinking about you all while enjoying Easter brunch at the G.F. tomorrow…
When someone has been proven wrong on multiple occasions, the fact that he's an actual lawyer is irrelevant. He has no credibility because he makes stuff up (proven) and gets basic facts wrong.
ElvisMickey
Well-Known Member
Chi84
Premium Member
Oh for heaven's sake. This guy's bio (a former store CM who lives near WDW) and politics are irrelevant to the thread. The one substantive comment he's made about RCID (it was built to facilitate a city that never materialized) is factually incorrect. He's trolling the thread to get reactions and attention.
I wouldn't dream of telling people how to spend their time, but really guys? After all the substantive and informative discussion we had two days ago?
mikejs78
Premium Member
I mean, this is silly and has nothing to do with the conversation at hand.
Chip Chipperson
Well-Known Member
You introduced yourself to this thread by declaring everyone else ignorant and bragging about whatever is in your bio, while also claiming you can't trust what people post when they use fake names. What reaction did you expect if not the one you got?
ElvisMickey
Well-Known Member
OK. Chuck…
GoofGoof
Premium Member
You are complaining about being labeled a troll because you disagree with some posters here on the topic but then proceed to label anyone who thinks the Governor is wrong and Disney is right Disney apologists? A bit of a double standard no?Been here since 2009…still need to listen to the “troll” comments. And the majority of you folks who are talking
Is everyone here a F’ing Disney apologist?
And what makes you right? And everyone else who agrees with you? Enlighten us…
Chi84
Premium Member
The point is he's getting exactly the attention and reaction he wants. Why?
GoofGoof
Premium Member
Getting back on topic….this statement from the king Governor of FL:
“But now that Disney has reopened this issue, we’re not just going to void the development agreement they tried to do, we’re going to look at things like taxes on the hotels, we’re going to look at things like tolls on the roads,” he said. “We’re going to look at things like developing some of the property that the district owns.”
Not sure how Disney reopened anything considering the contract they signed was signed before the new board was even created, but ignoring that fact we’ve talked some about the first 2 threats of hotel tax and tolls on roads but not about the 3rd threat of developing the property that the district owns. I know that the district does own land but I thought that land was already used for municipal purposes. Can they legally remove a utility facility and/or sell the facility and land to someone else or does the development agreement prevent that too?
“But now that Disney has reopened this issue, we’re not just going to void the development agreement they tried to do, we’re going to look at things like taxes on the hotels, we’re going to look at things like tolls on the roads,” he said. “We’re going to look at things like developing some of the property that the district owns.”
Not sure how Disney reopened anything considering the contract they signed was signed before the new board was even created, but ignoring that fact we’ve talked some about the first 2 threats of hotel tax and tolls on roads but not about the 3rd threat of developing the property that the district owns. I know that the district does own land but I thought that land was already used for municipal purposes. Can they legally remove a utility facility and/or sell the facility and land to someone else or does the development agreement prevent that too?
ElvisMickey
Well-Known Member
Really?
An apologist is different than a troll. I’ve been Here since 2009…far from a troll. You’ve liked some of my posts over the years. Don’t deny it. And right now I’m totally getting beaten up by pretty much everyone here, and still punching back. And this coming from a moderate. If anyone appreciates piling on, bring it on…
Drdcm
Well-Known Member
Some questions that have probably been answered but I can’t seem to find it. Does Disney have to show harm done? What would qualify as harm in a legal setting?
My extent of law knowledge revolves around malpractice cases and there has to be demonstrable harm - generally something that can be tangibly measured.
My extent of law knowledge revolves around malpractice cases and there has to be demonstrable harm - generally something that can be tangibly measured.
flynnibus
Premium Member
Been here since 2009…still need to listen to the “troll” comments. And the majority of you folks who are talking
Ehh… what you think someone joins your team or something when they react to your post?
Sorry, saying something normal in one place does not give you immunity to be wrong elsewhere.
Read the thread. Pick an item you don’t agree with and make a convincing argument to your point.
If you just want to rehash old stuff and just talk about what side you think someone is on… most will just scroll past your selfish posts.
ElvisMickey
Well-Known Member
Attention
? From someone who’s barely posted in months. Unless you’re the California, Disney 
kissing folks on here, you’re the devil’s spawn…
LittleBuford
Well-Known Member
You would say that, you Disney apologist, you!
Chi84
Premium Member
Reposting in an effort to get back on track.