lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
In my quick read the judge essentially says in her opinion Disney were trying to argue that the agreements were no longer in force in state court but their federal arguments hinged on the agreements being valid.
The judge states that if she rules for the CFTOD she feels that the federal claims are likely to fail - i.e. adopting the CFTOD argument entirely. She absolutely wants to rule on the hypothetical.
Just read it and I agree. The order pretty much straight up says that it’s being considered because it might influence the federal decision.
She also reiterated the District’s bizarre claim that the agreements would suddenly be applicable in five years under SB 1604.
She also buys into the nonsense claim that the District is being hindered in doing its work. The District still has not officially started work on a new comprehensive plan. They’re not being delayed on making changes to the development regulations because they don’t have an alternate plan to use as a basis as required by state law. And the only change they’ve even talked about is affordable housing which, due to state law, is now automatically allowed within most of the District.
Last edited: