manmythlegend
Well-Known Member
For the record, I'm also a coaster enthusiast and travel to around 20 parks a year, Disney or otherwise. I have nothing against thrill rides, and would take more of them, sure, but simply stating facts that Disney has a different demographic. There will always be thrill rides, but they're never going to build an Incredible Hulk or a Mako. If a good chunk of your audience thinks that Incredicoaster is pretty extreme, maybe too extreme for their liking, they're not just going to throw up thrill rides all the time with abandon.
What they need more of are things everyone can do, regardless of age or size, that can move people decently. If that's a thrill ride, great. But there are lots of other options.
What I'm seeing from your posts is a ride focused mentality and constantly talking about wanting more thrill rides when, as I've said, that's not Disney's main bag and will never be. Hence my responses. Disney is not going to suddenly turn themselves into Busch Gardens or Cedar Point. That's not what they do, and for someone who's been to every Disney park, it's not coming across that you totally grasp that.
For the record, I don't even like max thrill rides. They make me throw up. There isn't a single ride in any Disney property that would show up on any list of the most thrilling rides in the world.
What I do like are rides that cause an adrenaline spike. Splash, Big Thunder, EE, Tron, etc. Many guests are able to do those rides (perhaps not the super elderly or babies though). But I would say Disney has a good balance of rides for everyone. Do you disagree with that?
The only other theme park I go to is Universal. Not really a fan of any other parks. Atmosphere and design mean a lot to me. But I still want my spike of adrenaline.