This would be a full day for me.!
It used to be two full days. To see everything just once. In a toltally immersive, fully cohesive one of a kind park.
This would be a full day for me.!
You are whittling down the "theme" park experience to just attractions. If you limit yourself to just one aspect, your setting yourself up for disappointment. If your family loves the aquarium, would you not more experiences to share together, as a family, rather than sitting in a dark ride buggy or boat just zooming from one attraction to the next? And dont get me wrong, I love attractions as much as the next guy, but the experience can be so much more unique when you have a good balance of attractions, food and edutainment, which EPCOT did indeed once have.Good Point but how many people are even riding Ellen at this point? For the longest its been a ride that I skip and I think that is probably true for most people.
Two new rides combined with the existing rides and world show case would be a good
start.
Spaceship earth
Test track
Space
Nemo- my family loves the aquarium
The land
Soarin
Frozen ride
3 callaberos
Rat.
Guardians of the Galaxy- hopefully
Hopefully a rejuvenated imagination or improved ride.
Also, not to mention the movie attractions.
This would be a full day for me.
Fingers are crossed on my end!
It used to be two full days. To see everything just once. In a toltally immersive, fully cohesive one of a kind park.
I'll be shot down by some for this, but I'd say that's a very apt comparison.It sounds like the Epcot of yesteryear parallels the Tokyo Disneysea of today in terms of quality and impressiveness.
I'm not sure. I've read somewhere that it's full of mold now.
ETA - Haha - found a link to our very own WDWMagic when Googling, that answers your very question.
Blipverts.You are right but I will say this. I remembered back in the day going to this park when I was a teenager...and I was bored to tears...and to be honest I would still be bored to tears now if the park was the same. I won't even mention my kids. Not saying I'm right or wrong but really this comes down to personal tastes. I think a majority of people that go to theme parks today want to have fun and maybe not get the "Disneyfied" education type ride that lasts for 30-45 min.'s and is based on very little thrills and or excitement.
I realize this is a bit of blasphemy on this board but I just think the consumers needs have changed over the years. I also believe that the changes that are occurring seem to be mirroring what the consumer wants. This is the person that goes to Disney every 2-3 years and not the Disney nuts like us. LOL!
Just my two cents. As mentioned, I don't think there is a right answer as to how the redevelopment of Epcot should be planned because I think the right answer will vary greatly depending on if you are asking the "Disney Fans" or the casual theme park attendee.
I say give it another 5-10 years and Jackson Square will hopefully be a major part of Hamilton and the downtown core againHowdy Neighbour. Can't tell you how many hours I spent at Jackson Square during my time at Mac. Sadly, for me, it's now just "the passport office".
It certainly wasn't for everyone.You are right but I will say this. I remembered back in the day going to this park when I was a teenager...and I was bored to tears....
I'll be shot down by some for this, but I'd say that's a very apt comparison.
The right answer would be "blessing of size." There's enough space to have multiple different experiences for different audiences. Magic Kingdom for the majority, Epcot and Animal Kingdom for those who want to slow down a bit, and DHS for thrill seekers. At least, that's how I think it should be.You are right but I will say this. I remembered back in the day going to this park when I was a teenager...and I was bored to tears...and to be honest I would still be bored to tears now if the park was the same. I won't even mention my kids. Not saying I'm right or wrong but really this comes down to personal tastes. I think a majority of people that go to theme parks today want to have fun and maybe not get the "Disneyfied" education type ride that lasts for 30-45 min.'s and is based on very little thrills and or excitement.
I realize this is a bit of blasphemy on this board but I just think the consumers needs have changed over the years. I also believe that the changes that are occurring seem to be mirroring what the consumer wants. This is the person that goes to Disney every 2-3 years and not the Disney nuts like us. LOL!
Just my two cents. As mentioned, I don't think there is a right answer as to how the redevelopment of Epcot should be planned because I think the right answer will vary greatly depending on if you are asking the "Disney Fans" or the casual theme park attendee.
The problem with most people is the idea that a theme park is a collection of rides. For many, this means the rides have to fast, attention grabbing and to the point. Yet, EPCOT Center at its roots was a different approach to theme parks. Nothing like it had ever been done, and I can venture to say nothing like it will be built again. Magic Kingdom was already providing the family experience much like it does today. With rides like Space Mountain open the park offered a variety of rides with all your favorite Walt Disney classics thrown in. As a company, Disney knew it needed to offer different experiences as it expanded. What would be the point of building a second park like Magic Kingdom? With the blessing of size, any "Magic Kingdom" style attractions could go in that very park.The right answer would be "blessing of size." There's enough space to have multiple different experiences for different audiences. Magic Kingdom for the majority, Epcot and Animal Kingdom for those who want to slow down a bit, and DHS for thrill seekers. At least, that's how I think it should be.
Rat is a done deal.They're getting better at keeping secrets, 2 months out from D23 and nothing new is certain... I think the Beauty and the Beast ride that's planed for Tokyo is the most likely contender for the Paris Pavilion, only because it seems like a much more "timeless" property that they can sell plenty of merch for, like Frozen at Norway it would be a big draw. I don't know that Ratatouille ride/franchise has the same pull or the same "staying power". To me that seems like Mr Toads Wild Ride, it doesn't seem like something kids 20 years from now will know or still care about which is why Mr Toad rode off into the sunset at MK, but the Beauty and the Beast just passed the 20 year mark and their restaurant is one of the most popular things on the property
It sounds like the Epcot of yesteryear parallels the Tokyo Disneysea of today in terms of quality and impressiveness.
I fear that DisneySea is extending the appropriateness of IPs in certain areas (most notably the shops and the new Nemo ride, but I could also argue Toy Story Mania). But everything in DisneySea is so incredibly layered I think it exceeds the original EPCOT in that respect.I'll be shot down by some for this, but I'd say that's a very apt comparison.
Get out of my head.I agree with this, and would go one step further and say that the trajectory of Tokyo DisneySea mirrors EPCOT of the mid to late 1990s.
Tokyo DisneySea is still exceptional, but the amount of 'toonification that has already occurred is disconcerting. Part of the reason I recommend people visit it sooner rather than later...
I think of both Disney's Animal Kingdom and Tokyo Disney Sea as the spiritual successors to EPCOT Center. They're all extremely narrative driven parks with a clear message that they are trying to convey. Tokyo Disney Sea and Disney's Animal Kingdom are representative of a more "21st Century" take on the edutainment ideas that EPCOT Center employed. They emphasis personal Adventures that put the guest in the story instead of passively watching.I agree with this, and would go one step further and say that the trajectory of Tokyo DisneySea mirrors EPCOT of the mid to late 1990s.
Tokyo DisneySea is still exceptional, but the amount of 'toonification that has already occurred is disconcerting. Part of the reason I recommend people visit it sooner rather than later...
Toy Story Mania at Tokyo Disney Sea is one of the greatest failures of theme park design ever. They build a remarkably layered story with levels of depth (no pun intended) that go to extremes, and then they plop down a portal into Andy's Room that has nothing to do with Man's interactions with the Sea and other Cultures.I fear that DisneySea is extending the appropriateness of IPs in certain areas (most notably the shops and the new Nemo ride, but I could also argue Toy Story Mania). But everything in DisneySea is so incredibly layered I think it exceeds the original EPCOT in that respect.
For me, the closest stateside park to DisneySea today is the Animal Kingdom. Nothing else is remotely close.
Personally I would settle for Epcot of 1999, Except for JIYI, The Wand, LaL, ,Millenium Central and (an updated) Horizons would still be open and Test Track 2012.It certainly wasn't for everyone.
And I've said it before, had nothing changed and we still had the EPCOT Center of 1989 today it would be outdated beyond a joke. .
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.