Tony the Tigger
Well-Known Member
The dismantling of imagination and closure of wonders of life without replacement are the mortal sins to me...
Never even bothered with an excuse.
What excuse? They were
Sorry, dozed off. There was a lot of boring going on there.
I think they are playing long ball here. The subset of their guests who even remember those things, and the subset of that subset who actually liked and miss them, to be blunt, aren’t going to live forever.
More recent first timers will never know those things were there and will not miss them.
An IP based (when possible) attraction in as many world showcase pavilions as physically possible, and hopefully eventually something meatier in those pavilion spaces may bring Epcot up to speed.
That can still all be done with a nod towards education and innovation. However, as we often say, an attraction can have an IP or not and be well designed or not; likewise an attraction can have an educational component and be well designed or not. A good attraction need not be frivolous or mind numbing. Raise the standards.
I will say nothing should be shuttered without a replacement already in the works. Empty show buildings and weakly repurposed show buildings are sloppy and detract from the overall impressiveness of the park.