Grazia
Member
I don't think you're blocked from the Politics thread for posting about Social issues, but I do think you have to have at least 100 posts to participate in that forum.
Good to know! Thank you
I don't think you're blocked from the Politics thread for posting about Social issues, but I do think you have to have at least 100 posts to participate in that forum.
On topic: I simply feel that Disney could do a lot of good by adding something new that is uniquely male for the boys. That are far far FAR too many princess at this point. I think it would be nice of them to make a money with the prince as the central figure and not just some boyfriend (Frozen) or lustful object (Mulan) or comic relief (Moana - actually almost all the Disney films).
We take our boys the Disney films a lot, but we are worried that it will affect their sense of self; that they will never be more than a side kick.
Aladdin, Sword in the Stone, The Lion King, Hunchback of Notre Dame, Hercules, Tarzan, Rescuers Down Under, Atlantis, Emperor's New Groove, Wreck it Ralph, Cars, Big Hero 6, Treasure Planet, Meet the Robinsons..
Lightning McQueen, Woody and Buzz do pretty well for themselves. Good enough for 3 movies, at least.The lack of popular characters that appeal to boys is a big part of the reason Disney bought Marvel and Star Wars, too.
Other than Stitch and Jack Sparrow, Disney hadn't had much luck getting things to work.
Technically, all are Pixar. But I get what you're sayingLightning McQueen, Woody and Buzz do pretty well for themselves. Good enough for 3 movies, at least.
Pixar is still Disney They're actually my favorite movies. Their lineup is extremely universal, imo, relatable to girls, boys and adults.Technically, all are Pixar. But I get what you're saying
Subtle, huh? I don't hate the Jack Sparrow stuff like a lot of people do but I definitely wouldn't call those additions "subtle."Anyway, I'm interested in seeing a new scene. While we've had subtle Sparrow additions over the years, maybe they will have updated/new model AA's in the scene as well that will look nice.
My experience with the Jack Sparrow additions reminds me of my feelings about Star Wars Episode I TPM. At first, I liked it (finally a new Star Wars!!! Look it's Jack Sparrow!). Then, I realized it kinda sucked (Jar Jar Binks!!!! Jack again!?). Now I don't mind it so much and can forgive the bad parts and just enjoy what has always been good. Lol!Subtle, huh? I don't hate the Jack Sparrow stuff like a lot of people do but I definitely wouldn't call those additions "subtle."
I guess I don't really care about him so I just ignore him most of the timeSubtle, huh? I don't hate the Jack Sparrow stuff like a lot of people do but I definitely wouldn't call those additions "subtle."
In the old days Disney used to market their films to the whole family. Then the "Princess" brand and it's inevitable aftermath happened.On topic: I simply feel that Disney could do a lot of good by adding something new that is uniquely male for the boys. That are far far FAR too many princess at this point. I think it would be nice of them to make a money with the prince as the central figure and not just some boyfriend (Frozen) or lustful object (Mulan) or comic relief (Moana - actually almost all the Disney films).
We take our boys the Disney films a lot, but we are worried that it will affect their sense of self; that they will never be more than a side kick.
unlike Marvel.Pixar is still Disney .
It's been a pretty interesting shift. Growing up, my sister and I had a lot of merchandise (pajamas, plates, toys, clothes, CDs, etc) based on 4 individual films that came out in a 3 year time frame: The Lion King, Pocahontas, Toy Story, and Hunchback. I suppose that technically, 3 of those skewed male, but none of them had "GIRL MOVIE" stamped across them (Side note- while Pocahontas is a Disney Princess (TM), her movie, like Snow White and Mulan, is pretty male-heavy. We're introduced to John Smith first, and Pocahontas isn't seen until several minutes into the film). I'm not sure if it's because those 4 movies were practically a part of my daily routine or what, but they're still 4 of my favorites.In the old days Disney used to market their films to the whole family. Then the "Princess" brand and it's inevitable aftermath happened.
It's been a pretty interesting shift. Growing up, my sister and I had a lot of merchandise (pajamas, plates, toys, clothes, CDs, etc) based on 4 individual films that came out in a 3 year time frame: The Lion King, Pocahontas, Toy Story, and Hunchback. I suppose that technically, 3 of those skewed male, but none of them had "GIRL MOVIE" stamped across them (Side note- while Pocahontas is a Disney Princess (TM), her movie, like Snow White and Mulan, is pretty male-heavy. We're introduced to John Smith first, and Pocahontas isn't seen until several minutes into the film). I'm not sure if it's because those 4 movies were practically a part of my daily routine or what, but they're still 4 of my favorites.
Flash forward 21 years- I have 4 little cousins on my dad's side, 2 girls, 2 boys, all under the age of 4. I can't speak for the infants (except that the 1 year old loves the Moana soundtrack), but there's definitely a shift in what Disney caters to each gender. The 3 1/2 year old girl only likes Princesses (including Princess Leia ). She has several books that are collections of Disney Princess stories (that all happen after their individual films), and Frozen everything. The 3 year old boy is mostly drawn to 'boy things':Star Wars, Marvel, Batman... and Moana. He loves everything about Moana, which gives me hope.
While looking up the critic reception on the movie on Wikipedia, I came across the following:Did anyone even see the newest PotC movie? What was the overall perception of it's success? It seemed to come and go quietly. I don't think I've seen any since the second movie.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.