Wilt Dasney
Well-Known Member
Here's an article I found from Bloomberg detailing the acquisition. It states Disney will receive a licensing fee from Universal parks using Marvel characters in their rides, along with other financial incentives. Interestingly though, it says Disney may be prohibited from using Marvel characters at WDW, but not DL.....
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=aU_kuPju0Ngo
Thanks for the link. I know that Universal has to pay Disney a licensing fee. What I'm curious about is whether that fee is set or varies based on the number of people who visit the park. All the stories I've found are pretty vague about that.
And you're right that Disney can't use any Marvel characters at WDW, but could do so at DL. That's a condition of Universal's original deal with Marvel giving them rights to the characters east of the Mississippi.
Another tidbit I came across earlier that I hadn't read on these boards: If Disney uses Marvel characters at DL and then promotes the tie-in via national advertising, Universal's deal with Marvel would require them to explicitly point out that the characters could only be seen at Disney parks west of the Mississippi.
They couldn't imply that Spider-Man is now at "Disney parks" like they love to do in their ads or put a backdrop of Cinderella Castle behind the Hulk, for example...the ads would have to make it clear that this is a California-only deal. That might help explain Disney's slow movement on using the characters out west.