I’ve read every reply this guy makes and I still can’t figure out his argument.
OK, put a huge lagoon in the middle of the MK, and serve alcohol, and have lots of restaurants around the lagoon that all serve alcohol, and maybe I won't need to go to Epcot. To me that reasoning just doesn't hold up. Why would it be to my advantage to have all the parks offering exactly the same thing? I like the vibe of the MK, but then I also like the vibe of Epcot. I spend some time in one, and then some time in the other. What's not to like?
I'm having a little problem understanding what you are saying. It sounds like you feel that every park should have the same attractions? How exactly would that be done? Same restaurants, same nighttime show/parades? How? I don't mind speculating how it would change things if the world were perfect, but, it's not and it just seems odd since no one has to hop if they don't want too. It is a choice, but, it isn't a bad choice for many people, myself included. I use the travel time between places as a bit of a rest break. You consider it a waste of time, I call it recharging the batteries.
Nope cannot agree with that. No matter what is in any park there will always be people that do not care for what is there or, even more simply, like some of the other stuff that is in other parks as well and time limitation might create the need. I have gone so many times that I have a specific list, in my head, that I want to see, either new or repeated. I am not going to other parks because there isn't enough to do, I am going because there are other things that I like better and want to see them. That is a big difference. No one will ever say that if they went to everything, decided that what they wanted to eat fit the park they were in that they couldn't find enough to do to fill a day, that is even true of DHS in it's present state.All I'm saying is there are a lot of reasons to park hop, some of those reasons for some people are due to short comings in some of the parks. Adding park hopper to your ticket helps fix those short comings. Probably more so for first time visitors or infrequent visitors than for the veteran that knows what they want to do.
I think what he is really trying to say is that Tokyo Disney Sea is the perfect park and that you wouldn't have to park hop there. His avatar is Tokyo Disney Sea. Disney Sea is okay but I really don't see it as being any more special than California Adventure.
The OP is a troll and has had multiple user names here over the years. This is just what he does.
JordanNite for one.What were the other names?
Nope cannot agree with that. No matter what is in any park there will always be people that do not care for what is there or, even more simply, like some of the other stuff that is in other parks as well and time limitation might create the need. I have gone so many times that I have a specific list, in my head, that I want to see, either new or repeated. I am not going to other parks because there isn't enough to do, I am going because there are other things that I like better and want to see them. That is a big difference. No one will ever say that if they went to everything, decided that what they wanted to eat fit the park they were in that they couldn't find enough to do to fill a day, that is even true of DHS in it's present state.
No doubt that millions use the feature(for good reasons, too)......but what I'm getting at is the obvious but often overlooked:
A guest only hops when she can not get what she wants in the first park. If a park were sound enough then one would not leave it to go to another.
When I'm in Tokyo I do not park hop because each of the two parks are self contained experiences, offerings everything I could ever want/need for the day from attractions to eats to shopping
And when I'm in Anaheim I hop on a very limited basis because once again, for the most part, each park is sufficient.
A guest only hops when she can not get what she wants in the first park. If a park were sound enough then one would not leave it to go to another.
True. It's like insurance. I get it. There's value there for spontaneity. I'm just saying that those who don't end up park hopping didn't need to pay for it. That type of planning might be better suited for families who need to plan out their days at WDW.
Spontaneity! That's our biggest reason as well. With the way everything is geared you need to do a lot of pre-planning, dinner reservations, FP+'s, special parties or EMH. But sometimes it just nice to decide, Lets head to EPCOT for dinner and see what we find.
Its just the wife and I so for us that works out nice, I can understand for larger groups it might be a bigger issue.
Still isn't $50/day, more like ~$50 for the length of a ticket. For us that's usually around $7-8 which is reasonable for our use. We might not use it every day but it's nice to go to a park, rest at the resort and then go to a different park for dinner. I have no complaints.I believe they always had park hopper since they went to the passport and away from the A-F ticket system.
But it was only a $20 add on until a few years ago when it jumped to around $50 a day.
Park hopping at its core demonstrates shortcomings.
I find it almost funny how Disney markets "park hopping" as a desirable feature------and millions mindlessly eat it up.
Park hopping at its core demonstrates shortcomings.
I find it almost funny how Disney markets "park hopping" as a desirable feature------and millions mindlessly eat it up.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.