Chef Mickey
Well-Known Member
Nice troll account.Park hopping at its core demonstrates shortcomings.
I find it almost funny how Disney markets "park hopping" as a desirable feature------and millions mindlessly eat it up.
Nice troll account.Park hopping at its core demonstrates shortcomings.
I find it almost funny how Disney markets "park hopping" as a desirable feature------and millions mindlessly eat it up.
Probably true, but, the discussion was about park hopping in general not the relative virtue of DHS in it's current state. The merits of park hopping go way past one single park and what it does and doesn't offer. It, in fact, has nothing to do with it at all. It is much more a personal touring style that is either justified by an individual or it isn't. Those that do justify it get park hopping that those the don't... do not!The OP has a point and is not trolling. Think about it, how many people would use a one day, one park ticket at DHS in it's current state? Almost none.
It looks like you more or less understand what I'm getting at--- you indeed got the gist(Yes, you surprised me afterall).......Which begs the question: why did you announce earlier to the board that you did not know what my point is when you had a fairly good grasp of it???? And you even prefaced it with a "to be honest"......
Hmmmmm??
Time to expand on my point.
If individual Disney parks (Universal, too) offered an experience so stellar, so over the top, something so profound and meaningful then the park goer would have little desire to seek entertainment at another park. If these individual parks arrested the guest like what Star Wars did to the movie goer in 1977.........whereby viewers would not leave their seats because they were so invested and saturated, just fully engrossed in the experience, even forsaking bathroom breaks and concession eats from opening scrolls to closing credits............then guests would not concern themselves with hopping over to get that 2:30 Test Track ride or making that 7pm dinner reservation at Citricos. They would finish the "movie" which they started.
Fittingly, I bet Galaxy's Edge will arrest the guest to the point of her not wanting to hop to a different park experience.
No doubt that millions use the feature(for good reasons, too)......but what I'm getting at is the obvious but often overlooked:
A guest only hops when she can not get what she wants in the first park. If a park were sound enough then one would not leave it to go to another.
When I'm in Tokyo I do not park hop because each of the two parks are self contained experiences, offerings everything I could ever want/need for the day from attractions to eats to shopping
And when I'm in Anaheim I hop on a very limited basis because once again, for the most part, each park is sufficient.
Park hopping at its core demonstrates shortcomings.
I find it almost funny how Disney markets "park hopping" as a desirable feature------and millions mindlessly eat it up.
I feel worse for people that come on and start a discussion by calling others basically stupid for enjoying park hopping, like it is some kind of weakness in both intelligence and judgment and doing that might expect a "reasonable discussion". I also feel sorry for people that cannot see that there has been a discussion, however, the opposing side has had the better more sensible argument.I feel so sorry for the people just coming into this thread thinking the OP actually intended to have a reasonable discussion...
And don't ya just love how the OP is now MIAI feel so sorry for the people just coming into this thread thinking the OP actually intended to have a reasonable discussion...
lol. Naw. if you plan on having a reasonable discussion you don't use lines like. "millions are mindlessly eating it up" as an opening line. AS if to say we are too stupid to understand why Disney offers park hopping.I feel so sorry for the people just coming into this thread thinking the OP actually intended to have a reasonable discussion...
I immediately thought of this guy after reading thathe's forum hopping.
depends.....the current suck about it is how lopsided the parks are in certain offerings. for example the studios is nowhere near a full day park currently and if fantasmic isn't a priority can be done by legit noon if you plan smart. and than there's epcot attraction wise another half day park BUT if you like all the dining that the park is very heavy on than there's that. for example I often finish at epcot for dinner but do another park during the day.
park hoping is totally dependent on how you planned your vacation. if dining always matches the park you selected for that day on your vacation than it's not needed more or less. on the other side of the coin I hate crowds and if somebody asked me how to plan a vaca I would do 2 or 3 mornings at MK (rope drops) and finish all those days at other parks (also where your fastpass is) and than on your "MK" Day you can take it easy and soak it in without waiting.
No doubt that millions use the feature(for good reasons, too)......but what I'm getting at is the obvious but often overlooked:
A guest only hops when she can not get what she wants in the first park. If a park were sound enough then one would not leave it to go to another.
When I'm in Tokyo I do not park hop because each of the two parks are self contained experiences, offerings everything I could ever want/need for the day from attractions to eats to shopping
And when I'm in Anaheim I hop on a very limited basis because once again, for the most part, each park is sufficient.
Exactly. Not misunderstood at all.If millions use the park hopper for good reasons, it can't be that misunderstood.
If millions use the park hopper for good reasons, it can't be that misunderstood.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.