vancee
Well-Known Member
And suddenly everything becomes so clear.
And suddenly everything becomes so clear.
Disney-MGM Studios was never cool.
"No one in this thread is overreacting."
[quoted posts of overreactions]
"Those don't count because they're knee jerk and 'grind my gears' posts." (Whatever that means.)
Sure, no one's overreacting if you handwave away posts of actual overreactions.
thanksI give you points for having a good attitude and a sense of humor.
I made a chicken little themed birthday cake for my nephew the year the movie came out.Chicken Little was my favorite movie. They need to make a second one now!!!
He loved that movie
Can you convince me that a Hollywood land could be cool? Because all I can think of are large, ugly soundstages.
Luckily the mayor will be gone next year. Hopefully someone who will be willing to work better with Disney and encourage growth for the resort will replace him. @TP2000 time to start thinking about a campaign slogan.
Praise be
Neither is "theming."Both the "Victorian" theming and the Pixar Pier ideas are both band aids for the weakest land at DLR. I just prefer the Pixar theming.
Improving aesthetics does not automatically mean improving the themed experience.But the land already had brands and characters slapped on it. That's not dumbing down, that's doing the exact same thing. The lipstick is already on the pig, they are just changing the shade. If they improve upon the Screamin queue and put something where Maliboomer was, then it is an improvement. The land is ugly and empty. If the land is less ugly and less empty, it's an improvement. Plus, Pixar is located in California. Nothing wrong with California being represented with a Disney twist.
It was to work with the force perspective and make it seem more "in the distance". It works so well because it catches the eye and makes the guest want to walk towards it and see what's going on. The tree growth in front plays on the "abandoned" storyline as guest wonder how a building in such despair be functioning.Just make it more like the area surrounding Tower of Terror at MGM. One of the weirdest differences between the two was that the MGM version looked more like it was in the Hollywood Hills than the one actually located in Southern California. Maybe they cheaped or maybe they figured people had already seen that sort of thing in California. Either way, both versions were charming in their own ways as a result.
Yes and it's brilliant. DCA's was flat with no landscaping, whereas MGM's has hills and looks like it really is in Hollywood. DCA's wasn't even imposing, it looked dinky. Still, it was charming.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.