Curious Constance
Well-Known Member
My point is that it does fit because seaside piers were not a collective architecture to begin with, as a matter of fact they never even had much of any Victorian architecture in real life in the west coast.
With that said I agree that it wasn’t the best decision because an all Pixar cartoonish theme doesn’t evoke the same feeling of a place in time that most think of when talking about a seaside pier.
Like I mentioned before, they could have still used all Pixar characters and have integrated them into a more nostalgic setting of a fantazised Victorina pier. The incredibles dark ride idea being a perfect example. They even have a proposal from years back for such a thrill ride that they scrapped because of possible lower than expected ride capacity.
Yes, integrated characters into an existing theme/setting, aren't nearly as jarring as the larger than life, red-headed cowboy doll approach they are taking with this project. They have to be so obvious they even have to call it Pixar Pier. "Hey! Don't miss the fact that we're displaying all of our movie characters over here! We have our Incredicoaster! We have our Bingbong Candy Shop! Over here is our Toy Story Characters! Further down the road you can see our Inside Out gang on a ride we moved from the other side of the park and changed over from our older characters who aren't generating any profit for us anymore!" It's like they take the most easy to guess, anyone could come up with ideas and run with them. And this from the company who constantly brags that they are cutting edge, and innovative in the theme park world?
It's just frustrating knowing what the imagineers are capable of designing and building and what management approves for the parks they control/pay for. And particularly annoying when they go over existing attractions with this junk.