Orlando Becoming East Coast Headquarters for Disney Parks, Experiences, and Products

flynnibus

Premium Member
Disney has retail, restaurant and commercial managed properties/buildings all over the area, Flamingo Crossing - Celebration area commercial buildings and The Crossroads to name a few. Here’s a partial list of some commercial properties that Disney owns in the area, that are currently leasing. Not all of these are owned by Disney, but most are. https://www.loopnet.com/search/commercial-real-estate/disney-kissimmee-fl/for-lease/

This is just a small sampling of some of their commercial properties. I think most people would be surprised to know how much land/buildings that Disney owns in Central Florida.

Meh - developing wdw and its adjacency (as a form of control for wdw and its surroundings) is not really in the same bucket as jumping into office space developments across the state. And celebration is its own folly the company has minimized.

This is an asset to manage… but I don’t see disney investing to build a corp campus for others with the aspirations of making it a venture.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
I really thought the feud would have resulted in TWDC pulling out of this.

So far, I am happily wrong?

Who knows, next week there may be a new feud between the Governor and TWDC.

A great partnership lasted for over 50 years, and it only took one person to kill it.

Despite all the public discourse I suspect it’s still a great partnership behind closed doors.

I’ve always chuckled that politicians will vilify each other on the senate floor and then go out for dinner and drinks after the cameras turn off, this is likely the same thing. Publicly they appear “at war” but when the cameras are off I suspect not much has changed in the relationship.
 

WDWFanRay

Well-Known Member
This is an asset to manage… but I don’t see disney investing to build a corp campus for others with the aspirations of making it a venture.

They’re either building it for themselves now, or building it with the anticipation of using it later. They bought the land with the intention of moving some CA divisions to Florida, but that is either delayed or cancelled. They’re not going to turn around and sell the land, so it makes sense to build something on it as a place holder. They’ve done this many times in the past, so it’s not an automatic to assume that the construction will be used by Disney, at least in the short term.
 

WDWFanRay

Well-Known Member
And celebration is its own folly the company has minimized.
If it were a folly, they wouldn’t keep adding to it (Island Village, continuing commercial construction on Celebration Blvd) If Celebration was really a “folly” they wouldn’t have continued to invest over and over again in their community projects. (Golden Oaks, the 32ha site affordable housing development, Cotino planned community in California, etc)

Also, it was always Disney’s intention to have Celebration become its own entity, just like Golden Oaks, Cotino and the new affordable community they’re building off of 429 will eventually become independent from Disney.

Obviously the building of communities has been successful for Disney and I would expect more communities to be announced in the future.
 
Last edited:

flynnibus

Premium Member
They’re either building it for themselves now, or building it with the anticipation of using it later. They bought the land with the intention of moving some CA divisions to Florida, but that is either delayed or cancelled. They’re not going to turn around and sell the land, so it makes sense to build something on it as a place holder. They’ve done this many times in the past, so it’s not an automatic to assume that the construction will be used by Disney, at least in the short term.
Why spend that money to build for someone else?

Someone else can buy and spend the money themselves
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
If it were a folly, they wouldn’t keep adding to it (Island Village, continuing commercial construction on Celebration Blvd) If Celebration was really a “folly” they wouldn’t have continued to invest over and over again in their community projects. (Golden Oaks, the 32ha site affordable housing development, Cotino planned community in California, etc)

These other projects are not disney… they are basically disney licensing or contracting its services so they can sell a branded deal.

It’s for all intents.. a simple licensing deal. Disney is not making this a corporate competency.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
Despite all the public discourse I suspect it’s still a great partnership behind closed doors.

I’ve always chuckled that politicians will vilify each other on the senate floor and then go out for dinner and drinks after the cameras turn off, this is likely the same thing. Publicly they appear “at war” but when the cameras are off I suspect not much has changed in the relationship.
This is a good point and this is why we cannot believe anything in the press or the media on either side.
 

DCBaker

Premium Member
The Orlando Business Journal has obtained more details on the site plans for the Lake Nona complex -

"Now, plans submitted to the city have been obtained via a public records request and shed light on how the 1.8 million square feet of office space will be deployed and who is involved in the project so far.

Here are four takeaways:

Plans call for a dozen structures

The "Zazu Civil Plans" reveal that, at build out, the campus on the north side of Lake Nona Boulevard will include six office buildings, two flex buildings, three parking garages and a central plant.

The campus will be bordered by Lake Nona Boulevard to its south, Medical City Drive to its west, State Road 417 to its north and Helios Boulevard to its east.

Access to Loop Road, which is the main internal road circling the campus, will be available via two entrances on Helios, one entrance on Medical City Drive and another point of access on Lake Nona Boulevard.

A surface parking lot for visitors is planned on the southeast portion of the campus.

Buildings vary in size, height

As outlined, the six office buildings will total 1.46 million square feet in space, with buildings as small as 167,000 square feet and as big as 354,000 square feet.

The office buildings will range in height between four and seven stories. Per the project's entitlements, the maximum allowable height on the campus is 10 stories.

The two flex buildings will total 346,000 square feet — 100,000 and 246,000 square feet, respectively — and each are planned to be four stories in height, though a memo included with the project materials notes that the floor-to-floor height in those two buildings may exceed the 25-foot per-story standard.

The three parking garages each will be six stories tall and total 4,625 parking spaces.

The one-story central plant building is expected to be 20,000 square feet in size.

Open space at heart of campus layout

A memo notes the project's desire to "contain a strong open space element," and site plans reflect a network of pedestrian walkways and an open area at the center of the campus, surrounded by the office and flex buildings.
Beyond the office and flex buildings at the heart of the campus, two of the parking garages will be built on the west side of the campus, along Medical City Drive, and the third will be built toward its northeast corner, near where the central plant will rise.

Project team includes Central Florida, New York firms

The plans also reveal a project team for Disney's Lake Nona campus at this point:
  • ▪Orlando-based Harris Civil Engineers LLC produced the site plans submitted and is listed as the project's civil engineer.
  • ▪New York-based HOK, formerly Hellmuth, Obata + Kassabaum Inc., is its architect.
  • ▪The Orlando office of Langan Engineering Inc. is its geotechnical engineer.
  • ▪Winter Park-based Donald W. McIntosh & Associates Inc. is surveyor.
In addition, Tavistock Development Management LLC — an entity related to Tavistock Development Co., which sold Disney the nearly 60 acres for $46 million in September 2021 — is formally the applicant on behalf of landowner, and New York firm Macro, A Savills Co. is listed as owner representative."

Full article -

 

Sir_Cliff

Well-Known Member
It also gives an appearance so that Disney will be able to say, "What do you mean we're punishing FL by not moving our staff there? See, we're building.... something... so, yeah."
I feel at this point Disney announcing they were cancelling or scaling-back the campus would be worse PR for Disney than DeSantis.

DeSantis has campaigned on Florida being "where woke goes to die", Disney has been held up for months in the conservative media as the standard-bearer of "woke" corporations, and DeSantis has even talked of the dangers of companies relocating from California and bringing all their liberal employees to Florida. If the campus proceeds, it's more or less neutral for the governor. If they announce it's cancelled, the governor can paint it as another win in the battle to keep Florida "woke-free" and Disney gets dragged unwillingly into this whole political fight again.

I don't think the campus has been cancelled. However the plans may be evolving, though, I imagine Disney's aim is to keep its head down and stay out of the news.
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
I feel at this point Disney announcing they were cancelling or scaling-back the campus would be worse PR for Disney than DeSantis.

DeSantis has campaigned on Florida being "where woke goes to die", Disney has been held up for months in the conservative media as the standard-bearer of "woke" corporations, and DeSantis has even talked of the dangers of companies relocating from California and bringing all their liberal employees to Florida. If the campus proceeds, it's more or less neutral for the governor. If they announce it's cancelled, the governor can paint it as another win in the battle to keep Florida "woke-free" and Disney gets dragged unwillingly into this whole political fight again.

I don't think the campus has been cancelled. However the plans may be evolving, though, I imagine Disney's aim is to keep its head down and stay out of the news.
Having a larger permanent physical presence for Imagineering in Florida in one way or another has always seemed like a no-brainer.

That they'd bring people over and have them working out of what were essentially manufactured homes for "temporary" office space not even directly adjacent to their projects over the multi-year course of development always seemed a little weird to me.

Disneyland may be the heart of Disney's domestic parks but WDW is where the majority of the business is.

That said, picking up everything and bringing it here also didn't seem to make sense, at least at this juncture just due to the talent pool, the transient nature of Imagineering work that is very similar to movie making, and the way many of the skills needed for both industries are the same.

Quality people with the needed skills already live and work out there in large numbers so why try to force it here?

In this day and age, so much can be done on platforms like Microsoft Teams and Skype and I don't mean people working from home, I mean meetings where half the people can be in an office in one location and the other half, in another. It seems like they have the opportunity for the best of both worlds and when they need to send people from the Golden State to get stuff done here, maybe they could already have a work space for them that isn't crap and some degree of staffing and support on-site that allows them to do more here.

That said, Universal is definitely working hard to set up their own home-brew system here and is developing a legacy of creative development in Florida (that honestly puts everything Disney's done and is doing in that regard, to shame) and we're not that far from Georgia which of course, has been getting a lot of film and TV work so who knows what the future holds in terms of southern east coast talent?

Anyway, it feels like if a young person wants to work in theme park and/or attraction design and they want to work for a company with an amazing history in this space, they'll choose Disney for the prestige but if they want to actually work on creative and exciting projects, they'll probably choose Universal where there is an opportunity to make a name for themselves.
 
Last edited:

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
That said, picking up everything and bringing it here also didn't seem to make sense, at least at this juncture just due to the talent pool, the transient nature of Imagineering work that is very similar to movie making, and the way many of the skills needed for both industries are the same.

Quality people with the needed skills already live and work out there in large numbers so why try to force it here?
Where people are located is actually part of why Walt Disney Imagineering should at a minimum have a bigger permanent presence in the Orlando area. Universal Creative made the move years ago. Beyond Universal a bunch of other vendors in a variety of fields are either relocating to Orlando or opening offices in Orlando. Look at a company like Vekoma, who have not been doing a lot of work in the US, but still decided made sense to have a presence in Orlando.
 

MrPromey

Well-Known Member
Where people are located is actually part of why Walt Disney Imagineering should at a minimum have a bigger permanent presence in the Orlando area. Universal Creative made the move years ago. Beyond Universal a bunch of other vendors in a variety of fields are either relocating to Orlando or opening offices in Orlando. Look at a company like Vekoma, who have not been doing a lot of work in the US, but still decided made sense to have a presence in Orlando.
Oh, I completely agree the presences should be a lot bigger than it is.

And Universal is actively trying to cultivate the talent and develop a local reputation - not just with college stuff but with local outreach in a way that goes beyond basic PR/Blog-worthy moves.

Disney's clearly no-longer leading in this regard so it would make sense for them to be able to siphon some of that off where they can since they aren't bothering with the community investments in this regard, themselves.
 

UCF

Active Member
"Now, plans submitted to the city have been obtained via a public records request and shed light on how the 1.8 million square feet of office space will be deployed and who is involved in the project so far.
So how can we see the plans submitted to the city?
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Where people are located is actually part of why Walt Disney Imagineering should at a minimum have a bigger permanent presence in the Orlando area. Universal Creative made the move years ago. Beyond Universal a bunch of other vendors in a variety of fields are either relocating to Orlando or opening offices in Orlando. Look at a company like Vekoma, who have not been doing a lot of work in the US, but still decided made sense to have a presence in Orlando.
The “Dutch Neck Breakers” have an office in O-Town?
 

DCBaker

Premium Member
Here's an image of the proposed general layout of the campus from Growthspotter -

Screen Shot 2023-01-24 at 3.20.30 PM.png


 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom