I think Florida has always been on the edge of "sexy"...Florida is a lot sexier now than it used to be.
florida couple arrested on beach - Google Search
www.google.com
I think Florida has always been on the edge of "sexy"...Florida is a lot sexier now than it used to be.
Maybe, but it makes taxes a witch for the next three years...We’ve had full and not-so-full packages. Having a full does make things easier.
So many W2s.Maybe, but it makes taxes a witch for the next three years...
Do you think you could take standing in the vestibule for 6 hours listening to that song without being ... er, chemically enhanced?And especially none that have EVER gone into work higher than the peak of Expedition Everest
*looks at a CM I interacted with at IASW a few weeks back*
I need to quote myself. My numbers are incorrect. The "savings" would be on the delta between California and Florida salaries on the federal tax. They would still have to pay federal tax on Florida salaries. However, they would reap the savings of the state tax on income.Higher salaries means high taxes. Remember, the employer pays 6.2% SS and 1.45% Medicare tax.
Assuming a salary of $142K, (above this amount SS is phased out) that is an additional $8,800 burden on the employer per employee. Multiply that by 2,000 employees and its $17,600,000 a year. That amount goes up every year. Add to that the 1.45% medicare tax (which does not phase out but I will assume the $142K amount) that is $2,000 per employee times 2,000 employees equals $4,000,000. (I am not even assuming the 0.09% additional burden on employees making over $200K/year.)
Thus, a fair estimate for the EMPLOYER federal tax burden is $21 million dollars a year. And that goes up every year.
This doesn't even include the California mandated employer taxes.
It means salaries look and feel better without a 4 - 12% rake-off by the state
The next line in my post mentions the tax rates between California and Florida, and the next paragraph mentions their dissatisfaction with the state of California not allowing them to re-open. You have to keep reading instead of stopping at the part you feel like questioning.Since you are "sure it is politically motivated," why dont you provide that proof. Im curious to know the politics behind it.
Disney also saves the accounting $$$ from not having to withhold and forward state taxes.To the best of my knowledge, without having a payroll background (and no one in my household is a current TWDC employee; I have zero insight into the actual tax burden):
Payroll taxes are withheld from the employee’s paycheck and paid to the government on behalf of the employee, so Disney isn’t saving there. Federal income taxes still have to be paid. The employee will see an increased pay check thanks to no withheld state income tax in FL, but that’s not a savings to Disney (except it makes it easier to offer lower salaries). Also, California requires employers to withhold disability, so another increase for the employee - but again, that was withheld, not paid by Disney.
Disney will still need to withhold and match OASDI (Social Security) at 6.2% paid by employee and 6.2% paid by Disney, as well as Medicare at 1.45% for both, as those are federal benefits. Disney will still need to pay federal unemployment tax. Disney may see some savings by lowering salaries, but since the maximum amount of income eligible to be taxed for SS is $142,800, it’s doubtful the savings will be considerable. There is an additional Medicare tax on earnings over $200K, but the employee pays that.
Disney pays $434/employee on the first $7000 of wages for CA unemployment. Disney pays 0.1%, up to $7000 of wages/employee, for CA ETT (employment training tax).
In Florida, Disney pays 2.7% on the first $7000 of wages for reemployment tax, which is comes out to about $189/employee.
So…if my calculations are correct (and I might be completely off base), in all, Disney is saving about $700/role on ETT and $245/role on unemployment, for a total of $945 per role or $1.89M for 2000 roles. Not chump change, but Disney lost $70B last year in the pandemic. So, about the equivalent of finding a few pennies between the sofa cushions.
As for the employees, should they lose their jobs and qualify for unemployment benefits, CA’s unemployment benefit tops out at $450/week. Florida’s tops out at $275/week.
Disney needs to pay California’s 8.84% corporate income tax, but that’s based on CA operations, not payroll. If Disney cuts employee payroll but as a result makes $24M more a year on Disneyland operations - they‘re paying 8.84% on the $24M. And since employee salaries are deductible, might not want to lose that deduction, considering.
Disney gets hit with FL property taxes, while it enjoys CA’s Prop. 13 property tax loopholes.
Enormous, and likely long term.As for property taxes, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that FL/the county is offering some tax incentives to get Disney to move staff.
Disney's World Celebration Mobile Home Park Resort and Spa and Conference CenterThey're in trailers, so it wouldn't be a very good hotel.
I agree. 35-40% is much better than typical.Disney will have a better retention rate than most believe because of the jobs involved. Orlando is the themepark capital of the world. Florida is home of Disney Cruise Line and DVC. Having direct access to everything in the Division leads to better knowledge of the Division and more promotional opportunities. Besides much of the work in Immagineering requires travel all over the world working on the various parks and that will only increase as more Disney parks are built.
They’re not.Moving all these imagineers to Florida
I know not the main topic of this thread but so true. I grew up in the suburbs of NYC and much of my family still lives in Manhattan - for years, everything else to them was unfathomable.Nyc is another planet to everyone but New Yorkers
That's good to know regarding Imagineering. I was curious how this would impact the Adventures by Disney trip that includes a tour of Imagineering, etc.They’re not.
The NY to FL thing is real right now. We got about 12 offers in 2 days of our house being on the market and several were cash offers from the NE all with stupid price escalation clauses.I know not the main topic of this thread but so true. I grew up in the suburbs of NYC and much of my family still lives in Manhattan - for years, everything else to them was unfathomable.
Even have some family friends who relocated to SF for a high-profile FAANG role. Made the most of it: bought a beautiful home and Tesla, went to lots of the top restaurants, explored amazing vineyards, etc. Hated it. Thought the whole city was dumpy and lacked interesting architecture. Also hated that people would dress down in restaurants rather than always look fashionable. To them, LA is just suburbs and Orlando is nothing.
Meanwhile, I really loved living in SF and am currently based near Irvine, which is also growing on me. I'd be open to Orlando if the cost of living stayed reasonable, but it seems like the last year has decreased the gap between desirable Florida spots and more reasonable options in SoCal. Will be interesting to see if the 'return to work' decelerates the Sunbelt shift, or if people will remain set on Florida as an escape route from the likes of NY and CA. I know even my older sister (who was once a die-hard New Yorker) is open to South Florida now, and my dad was pleasantly surprised by Florida's Gulf Coast, so who really knows at this stage.
To all the Floridians dealing with an influx of New Yorkers, apologies.
Weirdly in WNY we are seeing pretty massive price increases in our homes (I live in an area where a lot of people from NYC own 2nd homes) from people moving from the NYC metro.I know not the main topic of this thread but so true. I grew up in the suburbs of NYC and much of my family still lives in Manhattan - for years, everything else to them was unfathomable.
Even have some family friends who relocated to SF for a high-profile FAANG role. Made the most of it: bought a beautiful home and Tesla, went to lots of the top restaurants, explored amazing vineyards, etc. Hated it. Thought the whole city was dumpy and lacked interesting architecture. Also hated that people would dress down in restaurants rather than always look fashionable. To them, LA is just suburbs and Orlando is nothing.
Meanwhile, I really loved living in SF and am currently based near Irvine, which is also growing on me. I'd be open to Orlando if the cost of living stayed reasonable, but it seems like the last year has decreased the gap between desirable Florida spots and more reasonable options in SoCal. Will be interesting to see if the 'return to work' decelerates the Sunbelt shift, or if people will remain set on Florida as an escape route from the likes of NY and CA. I know even my older sister (who was once a die-hard New Yorker) is open to South Florida now, and my dad was pleasantly surprised by Florida's Gulf Coast, so who really knows at this stage.
To all the Floridians dealing with an influx of New Yorkers, apologies.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.