NY Times: Bob Iger Effectively Back As CEO

larryz

I'm Just A Tourist!
Premium Member
Yes. As well as joy.
What role was Joy playing?
1586952147266.png
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
Hmm...

That's not surprising at the slightest. Remember that nothing has actually changed executive wide despite what that NY Times headline implied. That was just for clicks (yet lots of smart people fell for it).
 

No Name

Well-Known Member
If Bob Sr. promoted Bob Jr. to the very important position of CEO, you’d think he’d have an ounce or two of confidence in him.
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
If Bob Sr. promoted Bob Jr. to the very important position of CEO, you’d think he’d have an ounce or two of confidence in him.
Well you know how it is. We discussion board people have all the information and the answers to all of Disney's problem. The problem is no one asks us what we think. How rude!
 

Josh Hendy

Well-Known Member
No news here.... This was announced as part of the original Announcement that Chapek was the new CEO.... Just the formality. Iger is still Chairman of the board.
With respect, the real news story is the comically faint praise heaped on Chapek for what he has accomplished as CEO. It leads once again to questions about the odd timing and fumbled execution of Iger's apparently unplanned "succession".

The messages being sent are:

1. The financial side of Disney is still being nailed down by Iger, so shareholders and bankers need not worry.

2. The creative side of Disney doesn't matter, anybody can do it. Even say, the guy in charge of merchandise.

It doesn't mean the end of Disney as we know it, it means that the Bob & Bob show where financial imagineering takes priority over artistic creativity is going to continue for the next several years at least. With humorous lip service paid to the concept that Disney is more than a media conglomerate with an interesting backstory about a mouse.
 

SteamboatJoe

Well-Known Member
With respect, the real news story is the comically faint praise heaped on Chapek for what he has accomplished as CEO. It leads once again to questions about the odd timing and fumbled execution of Iger's apparently unplanned "succession".

The messages being sent are:

1. The financial side of Disney is still being nailed down by Iger, so shareholders and bankers need not worry.

2. The creative side of Disney doesn't matter, anybody can do it. Even say, the guy in charge of merchandise.

It doesn't mean the end of Disney as we know it, it means that the Bob & Bob show where financial imagineering takes priority over artistic creativity is going to continue for the next several years at least. With humorous lip service paid to the concept that Disney is more than a media conglomerate with an interesting backstory about a mouse.

If they were smart, they'd let creative be taken care of by the lead creative talent at the studio level. They seem to get it right more often than not.
 

the.dreamfinder

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
If they were smart, they'd let creative be taken care of by the lead creative talent at the studio level. They seem to get it right more often than not.
In animation, they’ve mostly done that save for being allowed to anything beyond CG. Iger’s hands off management policy means that if he thinks a business unit is fine, see theme parks, he doesn’t intervene. What happens when he’s wrong?
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
It's kinda hilarious that people are comparing the market cap of Disney with Netflix whilst ignoring the fact that Netflix isn't a media conglomerate and their stock price rise is nothing more than a bubble that will burst once this is over (plus they're becoming the Atari of streaming by putting emphasis on quantity over quality).
 

peter11435

Well-Known Member
It's kinda hilarious that people are comparing the market cap of Disney with Netflix whilst ignoring the fact that Netflix isn't a media conglomerate and their stock price rise is nothing more than a bubble that will burst once this is over (plus they're becoming the Atari of streaming by putting emphasis on quantity over quality).
This. Netflix is ridiculously over valued. It will eventually come crashing down.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
It's kinda hilarious that people are comparing the market cap of Disney with Netflix whilst ignoring the fact that Netflix isn't a media conglomerate and their stock price rise is nothing more than a bubble that will burst once this is over (plus they're becoming the Atari of streaming by putting emphasis on quantity over quality).

If Netflix folds, where will I get my next Ecuadorian telenovela?
 

the.dreamfinder

Well-Known Member
Original Poster
It's kinda hilarious that people are comparing the market cap of Disney with Netflix whilst ignoring the fact that Netflix isn't a media conglomerate and their stock price rise is nothing more than a bubble that will burst once this is over (plus they're becoming the Atari of streaming by putting emphasis on quantity over quality).
Netflix has always been overvalued like a tech stock.
 
Last edited:

bartholomr4

Well-Known Member
Netflix has always been overvalued like a tech stock.

I totally agree... Netflix has $5billion in cash and 215 Billion in Debt. Disney has $11.6billion in cash and $56 Billion in Debt. It also has hard assets. Netflix borrows other company assets..... It will be a journey to dig out of this, but Disney is going to be fine.
 

Slpy3270

Well-Known Member
I totally agree... Netflix has $5billion in cash and 215 Billion in Debt. Disney has $11.6billion in cash and $56 Billion in Debt. It also has hard assets. Netflix borrows other company assets..... It will be a journey to dig out of this, but Disney is going to be fine.

I assume you mean $15 billion in debt lol. They would be out of business by now if they had $215 billion in debt.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom