I read a column on Packers.com called "Ask Vic" written by Vic Ketchman, where he takes and answers questions. Here is one question he answered about signing Flynn where he makes some good points.
Vic, do you think the Packers will try to get Matt Flynn back, seeing that he’s on the market? Would love to hear your take on him.
There are over 2,000 emails in my inbox and the preponderance of those emails are asking the same question: Will Matt Flynn save us? The answer is no, at least not this week. Mike McCarthy said on Tuesday that Seneca Wallacewill be the Packers’ starting quarterback on Sunday against the Eagles, unlessAaron Rodgers
was to walk into McCarthy’s office and ask for the ball. That’s a tongue-in-cheek remark but I got a kick out of it. I understand why so many fans want the Packers to sign Flynn. It makes a lot of sense, but there’s a lot we don’t know. Our lasting memory of Flynn is for having thrown for 480 yards and six touchdowns against the Lions in the 2011 regular-season finale. That was two years ago. Since then, Flynn has signed with the Seahawks, ostensibly to be their starting quarterback, lost the quarterback battle to Russell Wilson, was traded to the Raiders and then cut by the Raiders, who took a big hit in doing that, signed by the Bills and then cut by the Bills. I watched the Chiefs-Bills game on Sunday. The Bills were quarterbacked by a rookie who, aside from throwing an interception that was returned 100 yards for a touchdown, really struggled. I thought to myself how could Flynn not be the quarterback? Please keep all of that in mind, and keep in mind that the Packers have a pro personnel department that keeps tabs on every player in the league. They know the truth; we don’t. In time, we will.