Matt_Black
Well-Known Member
I suppose if we were to relegate it to strictly a venue that performed bag checks then it might be a bomb(s) that we should worry about. It would be very easy to sneak in enough components to build a bomb than to sneak in a bunch of firearms/ammunition to do the equal amount of damage. On the other hand, you can do just as much damage as a bomb if you have access to get enough firearms/ammunition into a crowded spot.
But, as I noted above, bombs are complex, guns are simple. And there's a lot that can go wrong with bombs. For instance, the Shoe Bomber. Theoretically, a brilliant scheme. What he failed to take into account however, is that feet get really sweaty, and that sweat is going to ruin your bomb. There's a reason that few, if any, would-be terrorists have tried that tactic again. A gun, on the other hand, has a much better success rate.
With bombs, it's pass/ fail, and that's it. With a gun, if you only get off one, non-fatal shot, people are still going to be freaked out.