EPCOT New Park Entrance coming to Epcot

HauntedMansionFLA

Well-Known Member
If they end up planting tall trees (such as the ones supposedly seen in the artwork), how different will it be from the tombstones, really? I mean, greener and somewhat cleaner, obviously... but it’ll still be on the way of SSE and all the architecture that surrounds it.
Oh, palm trees. I miss you.
It gives you four ways to enter or exit the park. It’s harder for guest to maneuver around the tombstones. And it does look cleaner and more appealing.
C09CFAFF-2970-40B3-A31C-70523468AB9A.jpeg
 

Goofyernmost

Well-Known Member
You do not just build new hardscape and landscape on top of hardscape.
Tell that to your flower pots. They can do it, but I think I went out of my way to say I don’t think they’re gonna do it in my second post, the one you have quoted. The trees will need deeper roots but the flowers don’t. But the argument is over I agree they’re going to tear the whole thing up.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Tell that to your flower pots. They can do it, but I think I went out of my way to say I don’t think they’re gonna do it in my second post, the one you have quoted. The trees will need deeper roots but the flowers don’t. But the argument is over I agree they’re going to tear the whole thing up.
Flower pots are nowhere near similar.
 

Spash007

Well-Known Member
I'm really curious to the timeline here, and why they wouldn't complete this half when it was already walled off. Only thing I could think of is having walls up on half of it, along with the tombstones on the other half causes too much congestion, so they want walls up on half, and nothing up on the other? Otherwise it just seems inefficient.
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
I'm really curious to the timeline here, and why they wouldn't complete this half when it was already walled off. Only thing I could think of is having walls up on half of it, along with the tombstones on the other half causes too much congestion, so they want walls up on half, and nothing up on the other? Otherwise it just seems inefficient.

It's possible that they will route all the guests along the side that was just demolished, wall off the center and other side and complete all the work there, then they would switch people to the completed area and finish the other side.
 

wedenterprises

Well-Known Member
I'm really curious to the timeline here, and why they wouldn't complete this half when it was already walled off. Only thing I could think of is having walls up on half of it, along with the tombstones on the other half causes too much congestion, so they want walls up on half, and nothing up on the other? Otherwise it just seems inefficient.

This, and because the improvements/additions extend beyond the tombstone removal walls.
 

jt04

Well-Known Member
I'm really curious to the timeline here, and why they wouldn't complete this half when it was already walled off. Only thing I could think of is having walls up on half of it, along with the tombstones on the other half causes too much congestion, so they want walls up on half, and nothing up on the other? Otherwise it just seems inefficient.

Probably different contracts.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom