New Disneyland Parking Garage and Transportation Hub

Travel Junkie

Well-Known Member
It would not be wise on Disney's part to antagonize the city and their neighbors on Harbor. Let the city win this one and simply redesign the bridge and move on.

Can Disney shut off Harbor? Sure, but they are reliant on those hotels on Harbor with the lack of on site rooms. Until that changes, Disney doesn't have the leverage. They would be alienating Anaheim AND their own guests.

The best thing they can do is to continue backing candidates that are pro- Disney and hope they win the next time around.
 

Ismael Flores

Well-Known Member
"To dream <da-da-da-dot-dot-dot-da> the imposs-i-ble dream <da-da-da-dot-dot-dot-da>...."

Mostly agree. But I smite thee for the OCTA/Metro service. Now you are asking for CMs who use public transit to add that much longer walk with no compensation.

Hell, no.

Just one more way for CMs to get screwed. I worked there decades ago when the 20 min. paid walk time was adequate compensation, along with the other perks. Now it's a joke. It's not the CMs' fault that Disney and Anaheim let the growth get out of control. Plus you are re-routing all the other passengers on the Harbor OCTA line to detour around Manchester.

F-ing no!

I really never understood the argument about CM’s having to be compensated for their commuting time or their time from parking to punching in.
What makes this so different to any other job that thousands of other people do and have to commute, park and then many of times have to prepare for work with a uniform. Most People don’t get compensated when they commute 40-50 miles then have to park in a pay to park parking in Los Angeles. Sometime that adds hours to the daily work schedule and many of those that work for the city or other companies that have to wear uniforms also have to make time to change into work clothes.
Seems like CM’s and some people feel like just because They work for Disney they need to be treated differently than the rest of the work force.
If I work for a company and don’t see that the benefit/wages don’t fit my liking then I move on to one that does.
 
Last edited:

Ismael Flores

Well-Known Member
A little off topic but I really hope that once they get this done that they go back and fix the mess they did in the west side.
That security area at Mickey and friends has got to be the worst quick design someone came up with.

There were plenty of different ways that they could have accomplished the same thing without tearing out so many tram load areas and planters.

The northern east tram loading area next to the welcome boards could have stayed and those ugly barriers just placed in a semi circle poisition leading from the Far East escalator.
Also the elimination of a few dozen parking spots in the bottom of the structure was another stupid idea.

Why not just leave the existing tram route that was already under the structure and come out and turn right and make the path go west outside the structure hugging the landscapes area that was there. It would have only blocked off one staircase that would have still had access to the inside of the structure in the first floor. From there do their loop as they built it.

I know they wanted to do this quick but seemed like little thought went Into it before destroying the look of the area and making it look worse then the existing eastern shuttle/entrance area.

Once that is all fixed they also need to sit down and one up with protocols in how to run those trams more efficiently. Whomever comes up with the rotations on where trams pick up and drop off also needs to be given a course on how to move thousands of people more efficiently. Starting with not allowing people with strollers to get in line on the disability ramp just because they don’t want to fold their strollers.
Having to wait 35+ minutes with a disabled person just because the line was full of parents with strollers shouldn’t happen
 

DLR92

Well-Known Member
I really never understood the argument about CM’s having to be compensated for their commuting time or their time from parking to punching in.
What makes this so different to any other job that thousands of other people do and have to commute, park and then many of times have to prepare for work with a uniform. Most People don’t get compensated when they commute 40-50 miles then have to park in a pay to park parking in Los Angeles. Sometime that adds hours to the daily work schedule and many of those that work for the city or other companies that have to wear uniforms also have to make time to change into work clothes.
Seems like CM’s and some people feel like just because They work for Disney they need to be treated differently than the rest of the work force.
If I work for a company and don’t see that the benefit/wages don’t fit my liking then I move in to one that does.

I count my blessing I don't have to deal with parking off site from my employer despite having lots of drama inside the work, boy I wish I could change jobs because of unnecessary drama from my daytime managers and supervisors. :rolleyes:
 

Ismael Flores

Well-Known Member
I count my blessing I don't have to deal with parking off site from my employer despite having lots of drama inside the work, boy I wish I could change jobs because of unnecessary drama from my daytime managers and supervisors. :rolleyes:

Many of us have those issues, off site parking, hours of commute and plenty of drama. Have left jobs when I see that the cost of my time and additional expenses surpass income. If possible have renegotiated contracts and if they happen to work great if not then I don’t feel it’s the burden of the employer to accommodate me for my decisions of the added commute and time it takes me to start my work day
 
D

Deleted member 107043

I really never understood the argument about CM’s having to be compensated for their commuting time or their time from parking to punching in.
What makes this so different to any other job that thousands of other people do and have to commute, park and then many of times have to prepare for work with a uniform.

Businesses attract workers with perks. If I can choose between working in South Coast Plaza at Nordstrom where I don't have to wear a costume and schlep myself from a remote parking lot to my workplace on foot, or at Disneyland where I have to dress as a pirate and deal with Katelyn from Tustin and her 3 screaming kids for the same money which one do you think I'm going to choose?
 

Ismael Flores

Well-Known Member
Businesses attract workers with perks. If I can choose between working in South Coast Plaza at Nordstrom where I don't have to wear a costume and schlep myself from a remote parking lot to my workplace on foot, or at Disneyland where I have to dress as a pirate and deal with Katelyn from Tustin and her 3 screaming kids for the same money which one do you think I'm going to choose?
Of course But it’s still an employees decision to choose the one that fits their needs. Business do attract workers with perks but only when needed and when the workforce is scared for what specialized position you need to fill. Theme park so have always filled positions with people that want that extra income, need flexible hours to accommodate schooling or now it seems older people that want to get back Into the workforce.
That is why they hire seasonal workforce or applicant that don’t intend to make it a career unless you are in management. Those that do go into management do get those extra perks which many feel strongly against and even have updates about them on other sites. When you have a workforce in thousands it is impossible to expect a corporation to offer perks to everyone. At that point it’s not a perk anymore and then someone else expects more.

It’s the person seeking employment to decide what’s beneficial for them if not move on unless an agreement can be negotiated that benefits them
 
Last edited:

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
Businesses attract workers with perks. If I can choose between working in South Coast Plaza at Nordstrom where I don't have to wear a costume and schlep myself from a remote parking lot to my workplace on foot, or at Disneyland where I have to dress as a pirate and deal with Katelyn from Tustin and her 3 screaming kids for the same money which one do you think I'm going to choose?

But it's not as though the job is without its perks. Getting yourself, family, and friends into the park for free at one of the most sought after tourist destinations must be a pretty big plus for most workers. Disney likely has determined that the cost of replacing low skill workers due to turnover from aggregating parking conditions is less than the cost to build more convenient parking. That's really all it comes down to. No one is sitting around getting enjoyment out of the parking difficulties they face. (Besides me :joyfull:)
 
D

Deleted member 107043

But it's not as though the job is without its perks. Getting yourself, family, and friends into the park for free at one of the most sought after tourist destinations must be a pretty big plus for most workers.

Well sure, but how about all that PLUS free shuttle rides to/from your car? Sweetening the pot helps.
 

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
Well sure, but how about all that PLUS free shuttle rides to/from your car? Sweetening the pot helps.

But then they'd have to hire more people, which would also need to park somewhere, and also buy more shuttles.

But I think they do have shuttles for Cast Members, don't they? I've seen shuttles that say Cast Members on the side.
 

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
Except that Disneyland is in a position where it isn't competitive in terms of compensation.

That article isn't credible. Disney pays entry level workers legal wages, comparable to other types of similarly skilled jobs. They could do the same article on any business with low skilled workers in an area with a high cost of living. Just because Disney employs thousands more people than most businesses, they likely have more people struggling like this due to sheer numbers, but nothing more.

I have a good job, as does my husband, we make way more than minimum wage, and WE couldn't afford decent housing in southern California. People that are earning minimum wage are surprised they can't afford to live in So California? I considered living there for a bit, but decided against it for a better quality of life for my family in Oregon.
 
Last edited:
D

Deleted member 107043

That article isn't credible. Disney pay entry level workers legal wages, comparable to other types of similarly skilled jobs. They could do the same article on any business with low skilled workers in an area with a high cost of living. Just because Disney employs thousands more people than most businesses, they likely have more people struggling like this due to sheer numbers, but nothing more.

But that's the point, isn't it? If you aren't paying livable wages and you need to fill literally thousands of positions you might consider offering as many scalable perks as possible when competing for workers that fit the criteria to be a Disney cast member. A free shuttle from/to the employee parking lot is a convenience that any worker would appreciate, especially in car-centric Orange County.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Curious Constance

Well-Known Member
But that's the point, isn't it? If you aren't paying livable wages and you need to fill literally thousands of positions you might consider offering as many scalable perks as possible when competing for workers that fit the criteria to be a Disney cast member. A free shuttle to/from the employee parking lot is a convenience that any worker would appreciate, especially in car-centric Orange County.

Why do you keep talking about shuttles, when they already offer them? lol
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
But that's the point, isn't it? If you aren't paying livable wages and you need to fill literally thousands of positions you need to offer as many scalable perks as possible. A free shuttle to/from the employee parking lot is a convenience that any worker would appreciate, especially in car-centric Orange County.

It is not Disney's responsibility to make sure their front-line employees are making a living wage. Their wages are comparable to workers in other jobs with the same skill level.

@Dr. Hans Reinhardt you should know this better than anyone living here in the Bay Area. We have tech workers that make a whole lot more than Disney employees and are homeless. So this is not a Disney issue but rather an issue with a housing market that is out of control in terms of values.
 
D

Deleted member 107043

Why do you keep talking about shuttles, when they already offer them? lol

Because @Ismael Flores said, "I really never understood the argument about CM’s having to be compensated for their commuting time or their time from parking to punching in. What makes this so different to any other job that thousands of other people do and have to commute, park and then many of times have to prepare for work with a uniform."

I was simply responding that it's a perk they're offering to attract workers. That's it.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom