sweetpee_1993
Well-Known Member
As if I wasn't pumped enough for our trip in 48 days! Not that I'm counting or anything...
Are you kidding me right now? Imaginary? .
This new scene replaces the shaking rocks. It is projection mapping and I'd expect it won't be confined to just DL. It's a fairly easy refit, but very effective effects. Can't always get to redo's like this immediately, though - may have to wait a little while for schedules and budgets. RE: Mermaid, can't blame the show producers for that. Larry and Lisa are excellent at what they do, and made something good out what they were assigned with the resources and direction given.
As if I wasn't pumped enough for our trip in 48 days! Not that I'm counting or anything...
I have. Turned over a new leaf.You've gotten rid of all the neurosis, my dear?
I have. Turned over a new leaf.
Absolutely. Hubby is afraid I'll not want to leave CA ever just for the weather. He swears I'm going to fall madly in love with the left coast parks. We shall see. I know there's a lot more than just Disney I want to see out there.You'll go. You'll have a great time. You'll wonder what you were ever worried about.
....You honestly think that's rope light? It's image-mapping projection, people! Yikes.
This new scene replaces the shaking rocks. It is projection mapping and I'd expect it won't be confined to just DL. It's a fairly easy refit, but very effective effects. Can't always get to redo's like this immediately, though - may have to wait a little while for schedules and budgets.
I've generally noticed over the years that when an attraction is at WDW and elsewhere that inevitably there will be more effects and details in the other versions.
BTMRR at DL always had kewl fiber optics of gold dust in that scene ... while MK never did ... Paris has the explosion in the shaft (fanbois, stop laughing!) ... I can't even remember what TDL has as I only rode it twice and it was pretty damn close to perfect.
My longwinded point being that just because TDO/WDI could add this to the FL version in no way should suggest they will.
I've generally noticed over the years that when an attraction is at WDW and elsewhere that inevitably there will be more effects and details in the other versions.
BTMRR at DL always had kewl fiber optics of gold dust in that scene ... while MK never did ... Paris has the explosion in the shaft (fanbois, stop laughing!) ... I can't even remember what TDL has as I only rode it twice and it was pretty damn close to perfect.
My longwinded point being that just because TDO/WDI could add this to the FL version in no way should suggest they will.
I will certainly second your comments on Larry. I don't know very much about Lisa to make any comment. ... But Mermaid flat out sucks for a 21st century Disney attraction. It would have been fine had it opened in the mid-90s.
Every so often, the company will surprise. Agreed that Mermaid is subpar, and a lot of others would agree as well. Lisa was with Universal for a decade prior to moving to Disney, and was responsible for BVS. She's very good, if not well known.If I'm correct, MK's Pan doesn't have the starfield and never received the special effects Disneyland received for Snow White either, which aren't as gnarly as these new effects for Thunder. It doesn't seem like the WDW counterparts end up receiving the updates/new effects.
WDW has been notorious for removing LN2 from budgets for new attractions. (Everest, anyone?) If WDW would do it, they would cut the LN2 from the scene, and just the projectors alone really aren't as impressive.
Anahiem and Tokyo constantly tinker with their existing attractions and improve them while WDW's versions rot without basic maintenance much less consistent improvements.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.