Splash4eva
Well-Known Member
When using DAS you use to be able to book another ride once tapping in. Now you have to wait 10 minutes before getting another oneForgive my ignorance but what is the 10 minute rule again?
When using DAS you use to be able to book another ride once tapping in. Now you have to wait 10 minutes before getting another oneForgive my ignorance but what is the 10 minute rule again?
Thanks!When using DAS you use to be able to book another ride once tapping in. Now you have to wait 10 minutes before getting another one
A great example ofMy new favorite take is how I have seen on quite a lot of other sites people stating that AQR can't count as an accommodation if everyone can get it. Basically insinuating that if anybody can use it then it doesn't count.
I wonder if some of that isn't based on different queuing systems for different rides. The part about the "minor" doesn't really bother me since minor children 14 and over can get into the parks by themselves. I doubt Disney is having 5-year-olds stand in lines by themselves. (I'll save you the trouble of finding an example of that and tell you right now I won't believe it.)As someone who thinks DAS was abused to an unsustainable level and the changes were warranted, the one big issue in all of this seems to be a lack of training and consistency about the "replacement" options. People are being told different things from ride to ride. Someone may be able to get a RTQ for themselves, as they're traveling alone with just a minor child, while at another ride they are being told the minor child must wait in the queue while the disabled person waits alone.
Feels like the DAS part of it was well trained and the game plan was ready to go, but they dropped thebudgetball on the park ops side.
Just realized I never responded to this. I don't think it's helpful to indicate that there is a lack of "human decency" in those who are suggesting an alternative accommodation for a disability. If there are posters who have posted that the disabled just shouldn't come to WDW at all, or if WDW itself suggested that, then I'd agree that kind of comment would show a lack of human decency. But a different accommodation that is less disruptive to overall park operations? Calling that a "lack of human decency" is pretty hyperbolic in my opinion.Rider switch is a choice and has nothing to do with disabilities. And then there is the whole human decency aspect to this. Disney has built their reputation on being friendly to those with disabilities, that is why so many go to the Disney parks when they wouldn't be able to go elsewhere. And I don't know how anyone can argue that not separating disabled people from their family is an "entitlement".
Disney has a lot of disabled guests because they made it possible for those with disabilities to tour halfway "normal".
It depends on what the “different accommodation” is and how it can be used.But a different accommodation that is less disruptive to overall park operations? Calling that a "lack of human decency" is pretty hyperbolic in my opinion.
The different accommodation in question was AQR. You can debate it's efficacy, but to call the idea itself a "lack of human decency" is pretty over the top.It depends on what the “different accommodation” is and how it can be used.
Not sure what that means… this was actually something i said way back when would help ease some of the DAS painOh the inhumanity --wait 10 minutes
Just to clarify you do not believe that DAS users were taking up significantly disproportion amount of ride capacity on high profile rides?It depends on what the “different accommodation” is and how it can be used.
I’m personally tired of the whole “DAS was causing disruptions to park operations” WDW has made such a mess of park operations by cutting live entertainment and park hours but yet this is supposed to be some noble effort? Eh, I’m not buying it.
being sarcasticNot sure what that means… this was actually something i said way back when would help ease some of the DAS pain
Correct. The numbers from Disney during the GAC case were for a family ride when DHS only had 1 family ride. It’s really unfair to use them as an example.Just to clarify you do not believe that DAS users were taking up significantly disproportion amount of ride capacity on high profile rides?
Do you put any faith into Len's HM counting?Correct. The numbers from Disney during the GAC case were for a family ride when DHS only had 1 family ride. It’s really unfair to use them as an example.
Yeah I get it. I wasn’t being critical of anyone.I actually think it’s a legitimate positive that that particular poster changed her mindset and point of view. She went from advocating (in that post I linked) for the idea that disabled people shouldn’t even go to Disney World to being one of their biggest defenders in this thread. That’s what I mean when I say everyone should give this new system a chance and not assume the worst of the people who are disagreeing with you in this thread.
Edit: Here's the quote in question:
Source: https://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/gac-to-become-das.873666/page-34#post-5727553
A mentioned, that same poster is now one of the biggest defenders of the disabled in this thread, so I think views on this have definitely softened over time, and what is being debated in this thread is really just around the edges. Everyone agrees there needs to be accommodations for the disabled to be able to experience WDW. We are only disagreeing on what those accommodations look like. People should not assume the worst of the people they are discussing this with in this thread.
Some. But do we know if that was only DAS or that included Physical disabilities? Or does Mansion load physical disabilities from the exit so they don’t get scanned?Do you put any faith into Len's HM counting?
That's infuriating, but also sadly unsurprising. Issues that can be easily observed/verified are harder to fake than ones that are "invisible."One anecdote I will contribute is that professionally I come across way more people trying to fake cognitive/psych disabilities than other types of physical issues - chronic pain is up there too. I would bet money that’s the case at Disney and am interested to see how this plays out.
Some. But do we know if that was only DAS or that included Physical disabilities? Or does Mansion load physical disabilities from the exit so they don’t get scanned?
And is it only DAS that gets the blue light or do others get it?
Regarding all the math from a few pages back... I think these are the relevant post (thank you Len):
Lens counting at HM they counted 1,750 people enter the LL in an hour, they also know that ~300 of those are G+ so but this count ~82% of the LL for HM was DAS, Golden Oak, or Rider Swap.
Apparently Len has gotten some confirmation that his numbers are close if not a little low.
Finally official word from Disney... but it's all outdated that GAC was 3.3% of people, but could take up to 30% of TSMM capacity. Also DAS has Tripled in the past 5 years (which I can't find the number but I think Len said this was also low.
So if we combine this data. 3.3%*3= 9.9% minimum now probably have DAS. Also they are taking ~80% of the HM LL in any given hour. I think these are probably conservative numbers to use when trying to look at the effect these DAS changes will have on the Standby and or LL queues.
What I can't see much evidence on (and would be very helpful for our hypotheticals) is average Standby vs LL ratio and the average party size at WDW. @lentesta any help on those 2 numbers?
That sounds tough. That’s a long appt!That's infuriating, but also sadly unsurprising. Issues that can be easily observed/verified are harder to fake than ones that are "invisible."
I suppose one benefit to these unending back and forth and what if conversations in these threads is it's making me pay more attention to exactly how DD struggles every day, esp with waiting. She had a 2.5 hr medical appt today - just a normal specialty follow-up, and I felt like I'd finished a marathon by the time we got home. It's easy to downplay/overlook how difficult things are when they're your daily reality.
So guests using wheelchairs, etc. don’t scan in at the LL entrance? I think they do at DL so maybe that’s where my confusion is coming.Len counted people entering the LL, so anyone that was using an alternative entrance would not have been counted
No…. IF we know for a fact what the genie+ number is and we know that nobody else was given LL as guest compensation, etc. during that time - then we know around 80% was a mix of DAS, Rider Swap, Golden Oak, and Club 33 as well correct?Overall from what was posted DAS was taking up ~80% of HMs LL while he counted.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.