I believe Len Tesla stated somewhere it was HM but I can’t find the post.If you can link the post you’re referencing that would be great, if not, no worries. I know it’s a long thread and posts can be hard to locate.
I believe Len Tesla stated somewhere it was HM but I can’t find the post.If you can link the post you’re referencing that would be great, if not, no worries. I know it’s a long thread and posts can be hard to locate.
Anything is possible. I think Disney wanted to go beyond just requiring documentation and restricting who would get DAS as opposed to a different accommodation.Could be Disney are waiting for the outcome of the current lawsuits and may move to requiring proof in the future
The wording of the ADA is that a public accommodation (Disney Parks in this case) can not discriminate against somebody due to their disability. It is clear that if Disney decided to make it so a person in a wheelchair could not access an attraction that it would be considered discriminating.If it's not abuse and it's legally mandated, it doesn't matter at all that it's "too much." Waiting in a short line is not a right. Disability accommodation is.
I feel bad for the woman, but her argument really doesn't make sense. She's not required to sit in the chair all day. It is an available option that she can get in and out of as needed if a queue is longer than she can stand or sit. What length of time does her doctor consider an "extended period" to be sitting? To me, her case is one that could be accommodated without using DAS to obtain return times, based on what information was shared.
If you can link the post you’re referencing that would be great, if not, no worries. I know it’s a long thread and posts can be hard to locate.
I believe Len Tesla stated somewhere it was HM but I can’t find the post.
We've been counting the number of guests entering both the standby line and the Lightning Lane, per hour, at key attractions.
We've seen instances where the number of guests entering the LL is:
For example, at Haunted Mansion we counted roughly 1,750 guests entering the LL line in one hour, and slightly less than that entering the standby line. None of them - zero - appeared to be VIP tours.
- Equal to or greater than the number entering the standby line
- More than half of the attraction's hourly capacity
We also think that the number of G+ reservations sold by Disney for HM is not more than 300 per hour.
So there's ~1,450 guests that are somehow using the LL line. None of them were VIP tours.
Some of them could reasonably be rider swap. But HM isn't a roller coaster and there's no height limit, so I'd expect that rider swap number to be super low.
Well, "Disney" didn't assess the situation. Some college kid with no training did.But Disney assessed the situation and issued her a DAS anyway. And since Disney is in the best position to know what's right... we have to respect that ..... right?
Well it's not legally mandated, so there's no issue.If it's not abuse and it's legally mandated, it doesn't matter at all that it's "too much." Waiting in a short line is not a right. Disability accommodation is.
Thank you - I kept looking in this thread, didn’t think to look as early as 2023. Those numbers are surprisingly high!Was it this post?
Well, "Disney" didn't assess the situation. Some college kid with no training did.
That is a prime example of a reasonable accommodation offering a mobility device to sit when needed, or stand when needed. Not DAS skip the line access.I feel bad for the woman, but her argument really doesn't make sense. She's not required to sit in the chair all day. It is an available option that she can get in and out of as needed if a queue is longer than she can stand or sit. What length of time does her doctor consider an "extended period" to be sitting? To me, her case is one that could be accommodated without using DAS to obtain return times, based on what information was shared.
Hopefully, what they are doing is coming up with reasonable accommodations that are not DAS.If there’s one thing they’re not doing here in my opinion, it’s blindly making changes that are going to have massive legal consequences. Their actions point to knowing there’s a significant amount of abuse or overuse.
Was it this post?
I'm going to add to this that I was told something along the lines of "you got the right answer, but I would have done it differently."
That is a prime example of a reasonable accommodation offering a mobility device to sit when needed, or stand when needed. Not DAS skip the line access.
Or put another way...CM - You can sit or stand when it’s most comfortable for you and we can handle the chair while you are on the attractions.
Patron - Sitting or standing isn’t relevant, what I need is to skip to the front of all attractions.
Absurd!
Because the issues with many people inflicted with this is they can have triggers around patterns and wants.. many can not handle 'change' very well. So their schedule and patterns are very key. Unlike a physical handicap where you are simply trying to avoid a physical constraint... in many of these cases you are dealing with mental and psychological issues that you can't simply rationalize with like you could another person.If this ride swapping idea is suitable for people with physical disabilities preventing them from waiting in line, why is it not suitable for autism?
It might be, depends on the individual. Some folks with autism will have issues if the party separates, some won't.Before someone jumps down my throat I’m starting this post by admitting my ignorance.
I am blessed not to have someone in my immediate family with autism.
If this ride swapping idea is suitable for people with physical disabilities preventing them from waiting in line, why is it not suitable for autism?
A member of the autistic guests family waits in standby, when they reach the front they join up.
Why shouldn’t this be the policy ?
Just saying what could happen… hence why there is a big concern for abuse.Then the Family of 4 with DAS leaves the park at 12:45 for the day because the disabled person cannot last more than a few hours in the parks.
Family of 4 without DAS
Continues making Genie reservations and enjoying rides. Watches the 3 o'clock parade. Has dinner at CRT - only later reservations are available. After dinner, the family watches the Happily Ever After fireworks show.
The Family of 4 with DAS paid +/- $436 for for 5 hours in the parks.
The Family of 4 without DAS paid +/- $436 for 14 hours in the
Aside from other possible issues, I don't think they can make any accommodation dependent upon group size / configuration. This would mean offering one thing to groups with two adults, and another thing to groups with a mom and two young kids. I've never heard of accommodations being contingent on the party you are traveling with and assume that's not allowed.Before someone jumps down my throat I’m starting this post by admitting my ignorance.
I am blessed not to have someone in my immediate family with autism.
If this ride swapping idea is suitable for people with physical disabilities preventing them from waiting in line, why is it not suitable for autism?
A member of the autistic guests family waits in standby, when they reach the front they join up.
Why shouldn’t this be the policy ?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.