News New Changes Coming to the Disney Look 2021

_caleb

Well-Known Member
Not if they refuse to leverage that experience and knowledge by insisting on being the same individual contributor doing the same role forever and never growing or adding additional value by LEVERAGING the gained experience in some way beyond what their prior role was.

This is why experienced people are preferred to be the pick for leading and training.. so you do leverage that gained insight. But if you just keep being the same role... you can be the BEST IN THE UNIVERSE at that role.. but your value and thus your compensation is going to plateau.
You’re still missing the point. Not everyone is motivated to take on greater responsibility or to move into management roles. Keeping the job (doing whatever the bare minimum is for the pay provided), over time, makes an employee more valuable to the company. Leveraging the gained experience is either enjoy the job as it becomes easier (more familiar, clearer what the employer wants, etc.) OR by asking for a raise.

In no scenario is the company entitled to additional output from a worker without compensating them for that additional output. But eventually, even “the same output as always” increases in value to a company. Unfortunately, that value is usually passed on to the executives and investors, and not often enough to the workers themselves.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Then nobody should ever get an annual raise, ever?
This is a misrepresentation of how salaried raises actually work. Anywhere I’ve been, you are reviewed annually, but a raise is not guaranteed if you don’t demonstrate improvement or progress toward specific goals. Additionally, there is pay banding such that you cap out if you stay within a certain role forever (e.g. junior, senior, lead, principal, director, etc.).
 

DryerLintFan

Premium Member
This is a misrepresentation of how salaried raises actually work. Anywhere I’ve been, you are reviewed annually, but a raise is not guaranteed if you don’t demonstrate improvement or progress toward specific goals. Additionally, there is pay banding such that you cap out if you stay within a certain role forever (e.g. junior, senior, lead, principal, director, etc.).

There’s usually a cost of living increase that everyone gets, and then an annual raise you can earn.

Not sure what any of this has to do with the Disney employee dress code though 🤷‍♀️
 

Lilofan

Well-Known Member
I’d like to see some sources on a claim like this, because I’m not sure it’s true.

But the relevance to this discussion is great. “It’s ok to treat frontline workers poorly because they’re not that good at their jobs and guests can take care of themselves anyway” is an interesting argument.
Someone once said “ A team is only as strong as its weakest link”. Treat them like crap is surely not a way to lead.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Sounds like insubordination. If you reprimand them , get ready to go through the grievance process when the union files one on behalf of the CM.
The implication was that if you continue doing a good job you are “refusing to take responsibility” because apparently responsibility = wanting to change jobs regularly.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
The implication was that if you continue doing a good job you are “refusing to take responsibility” because apparently responsibility = wanting to change jobs regularly.

No - you should pay attention to details, because you are so off point when you don’t read what was actually posted.

I didnt say “take responsibility” - i said “take on more responsibility” — because the topic was about someone expanding their role or value to the business if they want to achieve greater compensation.

Your retelling is completely false and changes the meaning… and ignores the context of the words entirely
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
If you catch yourself saying "When I was X years old I made X.XX an hour..." you should just stop, go find an inflation calculator and convert those numbers. Because you're going to sound like my dad reminding me he used to go to the movies for a nickle.

In 1985 I made $5.00 ($14.62) an hour and...
In 1995 I made $8.50 ($17.44) an hour and...
In 2005 I made $12.50 ($20.22) an hour and...
In 2015 I made $14.00 ($22.64) an hour and...
The point is not the dollar amount. The point is the ratio was similar. It was still minimum wage jobs for barely inhabitable apartments.

My first apartment at age 18 was somebody's attic with a refrigerator, a toaster oven, and my 13 inch black and white TV. The rent was $450 per month (in 1989) and my paycheck for 2 weeks' work (in an office) was $451 and change. I bought several packs of ramen and ate at both Grandma's houses as often as I could. So I have empathy for people making triple what I was making while the rent is triple what I was paying, but not sympathy. This is the normal order of things unless you were born into money.
And what happens when people DO go somewhere else and the company has to change their mind on what the job is?
I said don't take the job, so they aren't "going" anywhere else, they're not getting hired in the first place, and a more reasonable person will get hired instead. Not being able to dress a certain way is not a hardship.
 
Last edited:

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
I think there may be 2 conversations going on, one about minimum wage in general, one about wages in relation to Disney (who already pay substantially more than minimum wage).

A bag boy a legit job also, it’s just not one that I’d recommend as a career if you want financial stability. I’ve made a great living doing a job many find a “non real” job, I chuckle when people look down their noses at bartenders and servers because many are making more than the people acting superior, we often chuckle at the college educated folks talking about their $75k jobs and hundreds of thousands in debt. I also have huge amounts of respect for the trades and tell a lot of kids to become electricians, plumbers, etc… people tend to look down on those jobs also but they pay very well and are a door to independence and being your own boss.
Same. Bartending was my ticket out of the crushing hours and tough pay of retail management. It was far less responsibility, far more fun, far fewer hours, and far better money. Yes, there were shifts you went home with $30. Then there were shifts you went home with $500. Like any business, you start with the slow shifts, suffer through it and learn, build those shifts, and get promoted to better paying shifts when they open up. In fact, I had to start as a barback as well to get my foot in the door.

No matter what you do, unless you're very fortunate, there are dues to pay. It seems some people want to skip that part and think they are entitled to for no other reason than it sucks. It's also how you learn and improve.
No, I don’t agree that someone working for Disney Parks for multiple years doesn’t have “personal responsibility” - working ANY job full time means you have personal responsibility.

I think that’s the big difference to me.

A full time job should be a full time job with benefits, decent pay, etc.

A part time or seasonal job is what a student, retiree, etc would work.
Then we disagree. Not "any" full time job should support buying a home with a family. If you are 35 and live with your mother, you can probably afford to work at WDW as a cashier for the rest of your life, and then inherit your mother's house. All good. Life set.

If you're more ambitious, you have to act ambitiously. Staying a cashier at WDW for the rest of your life is not ambitious. It's a perfectly fine and legit thing to do, of course. But don't expect a mansion out of it.

If you want to make as much as a doctor, become a doctor.

If you want to make as much as a teacher, become a teacher.

If you want to make as much as a Disney cashier or a Target cashier (same difference) then become that. But don't ask for more than what *the job* (not the person) is worth.

The value of a job is not philosophical and certainly has nothing to do with anyone's rent or mortgage.

If you are willing to pay someone forty dollars to mow your lawn, and they tell you their rent went up, does that make mowing your lawn worth more?

It has been common knowledge AFAIK that there are "jobs" and there are "careers." Your life may vary depending on which you choose, and which you qualify for. That's why people go to school to become doctors, because it should pay off down the road. Now, I'll be the first to say doctors are no better than anyone else, but they earn more because their job is worth more.

If you can learn your job in one shift, then virtually anyone can do it and virtually anyone can replace you. Personalities will vary, but businesses are used to that. Those who excel get noticed and are rewarded in various ways, up to and including raises and promotions. That's how it goes. If you want to make more than a cashier, do well and get promoted. Positions open up all the time. Then the next new people come in as cashiers to take your place and the cycle repeats.

There will always be some who can't handle more than that. Worse, there are some who don't care and don't try. This is a merit based system. You have to earn things, they are not handed to you.

It is an extreme example when "no one" will do xyz job. That's an extremely unlikely scenario. You may have a harder time hiring, but it won't be "no one."

The biggest change has been the attitude of the work force. That's why if Disney raises these "low paying" jobs from $17 to $20, you'll still go to the parks and be met with people who are less friendly than they were ten years ago. It's a cultural shift.

But then people will complain when stores install self-checkouts. You are literally begging for this to happen by demanding higher wages at this rate of increase. The "inflation level" pricing you've seen recently won't go back down because wages are partially replacing the inflation. If you're OK with that, then OK.

The whole thing is pointless because once you complete the circle, the higher wage will still buy you the same place to live. In the meantime, small businesses who can't afford what Disney can afford will continue being swallowed up because paying $15 for someone to sit and scroll on their phones and do a mediocre job is untenable unless you are selling jewelry or booze.
Is arguing for and pushing for a higher salary not one of those "different options?"
Not if they can justify it having less to do with their own expenses, and more with what it's worth to the company.
 
Last edited:

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Walk with me for a second. It’s noon on a school day. You’re hungry and you want McDonalds. Who is working there to prepare your food.
I don't touch McDonald's but once a year, if that. It's a low budget product and that's going to pay low budget wages.

If you learn a few things at McDonald's, then go down the street and apply at Longhorn Steakhouse with your experience and immediately raise your wages.

There have always been adults working low wage day shifts in retail and restaurants. This is not new. Typically, they were people who could afford to work that kind of job because of their circumstances.

I started part time in retail. For various reasons, I decided to leave my office job and go full time. In order to be able to pay rent, I had to become a manager because a full time cashier salary wasn't going to cut it, plus I would be bored off my behind. I was already exemplary in my position, learned other positions, became helpful to my manager, and I took the initiative to learn from the existing manager. He generously stayed after work to talk with me for an hour or two on a regular basis to discuss the goings on of the day and what I could glean from it. Then he put in a good word for me with ownership, and I interviewed and was hired as a trainee. I left my office job, and had a little bit of an easier time.

The fastest way to get the best raise is to change jobs. So I did that a couple of times, too, over the years. But you need experience and stability on your resume to be able to earn that.

You are almost certainly going to struggle at times in your life. Anticipate it.
 

TrainsOfDisney

Well-Known Member
Not "any" full time job should support buying a home with a family.
Who said anything about buying a home?
If you want to make as much as a teacher, become a teacher.
That would be a pay decrease compared to Disney in the Orlando area I’m pretty sure. Which then begs the question, what’s the difference between a job and a career if the pay is similar? Is teaching a career or is it not?
 

Tony the Tigger

Well-Known Member
Who said anything about buying a home?

That would be a pay decrease compared to Disney in the Orlando area I’m pretty sure. Which then begs the question, what’s the difference between a job and a career if the pay is similar? Is teaching a career or is it not?
I highly doubt becoming a teacher is a pay decrease from being an entry level Disney CM. The line that teachers are underpaid is very much exaggerated. They are underpaid in comparison to doctors and lawyers, not in comparison to cashiers and baggers.

I give up.
 

Vegas Disney Fan

Well-Known Member
You are almost certainly going to struggle at times in your life. Anticipate it.

People also need to accept that every job has a ceiling, as a Bartender I’ll likely never make more than I do now, I’m one of the most senior guys (so I get the best shifts) and I’m in one of the best towns in the world for bartenders, the only way I’ll ever make more is by going back into management and working my way up to a VP or President of beverage, to do that I’d need to take a pay cut for the next decade though.

That’s my options, accept I’ve hit my jobs ceiling and keep doing it or take the plunge and start down the next path to make more, I can’t just demand another $20 an hour from my boss because I’d like my position to pay more. I’m fortunate that I make a very good living but even in my case I got a second job so I could stash away more money for retirement.

The irony of this discussion is I really want to move to Orlando when I retire, and possibly work PT for Disney, and that means stashing away money. I could take my existing savings and comfortably retire in middle America tomorrow but I want to live in expensive Orlando and live near the parks, that means putting in the work to make it happen.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom