Tim G
Well-Known Member
I'll add one... WHY??Connor002 said:Yes, but that begs the questions "If?" and/or "When?"
Both of which we do not yet know.
I'll add one... WHY??Connor002 said:Yes, but that begs the questions "If?" and/or "When?"
Both of which we do not yet know.
Timmay said:No, sadly Lewis didn't want his stories put on the screen because he wanted people to keep their own image of Narnia intact from the bookis.
As a fan of the books as well as the one movie now, I am not sure how I feel about a CON type attraction or Land or whatever...it just doesn't feel right, for some reason. Maybe if all of the movies are made and they are very, very popular, we may see something.
Connor002 said:B. At this point, it's too early to tell if the movie will do well enough to warrent a movie
Corrus said:I'll add one... WHY??
dandaman said:Er... something a little wrong with that sentence?
CTXRover said:An entire Narnia land in Animal Kingdom would be the way to go imo. Beyond the movie, it has a large following from the books, so it wouldn't just be a knee-jerk movie tie in. Filled with mythical animals and stories up the whazoo, it would more than fill the void that the rumored "Beastly Kingdom" land was supposed to. One major attraction and one mini-dark ride is all that would be needed to fill an entire land if the rest was highly themed to evoke the feel and look of Narnia. And if popular enough, any Narnia attraction could then be copied to help divide the original cost of R&D by placing it around the world at Disney's other parks (especially with the movie tie in, it would easily fit into DCA and WDSP)
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.