News Monster Inc Land Coming to Disney's Hollywood Studios

Spash007

Spash007

Well-Known Member
It’s been some time since I’ve been in the MV3D theater - is it possible to easily have the entrance on Grand Avenue itself?

Looking at the layout of the land and the fairly compact footprint of the ride, it doesn’t seem like they need to take over the actual theater

Otherwise what will Grand Avenue be? Just a street with the taphouse?
 
monothingie

monothingie

Nakatomi Plaza Christmas Eve 1988. Never Forget.
Premium Member
Moth said:
Once again, they're not replacing the only ride that has Darth Vader, arguably one of the, if not the most iconic villain in cinema, at the Star Wars park.


I've been hearing only conflicting information about the location since yesterday morning. It's a civil war behind the scenes, I'm advising everyone to stock up on canned foods and shotguns.
Click to expand...
Well @wdwmagic was not at all vague (considering the lack of public details) in the article that the Muppet Courtyard is the place and also made an articulate for its preservation. Perhaps there is still room for a change of plans if there is enough push back.
 
Moth

Moth

Well-Known Member
Is Monsters only the coaster? I swore they mentioned multiple attractions at D23....

Also the civil war thing was a figure of speech LOL. There's probably not any actual suits fighting each other over location currently.
 
E

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
Spash007 said:
It’s been some time since I’ve been in the MV3D theater - is it possible to easily have the entrance on Grand Avenue itself?

Looking at the layout of the land and the fairly compact footprint of the ride, it doesn’t seem like they need to take over the actual theater

Otherwise what will Grand Avenue be? Just a street with the taphouse?
Click to expand...
I would think the hallway that leads to the waiting area could just come straight out to the street instead of turning and out to the courtyard.
 
Brian

Brian

Well-Known Member
mattpeto said:
www.thewrap.com

As Disney Tips Shuttering Muppet*Vision 3D, Fans Decry 'Devastating' Move | Exclusive

Muppet*Vision 3D, the Jim Henson-directed attraction at Disney's Hollywood Studios, is on the chopping block and we have exclusive details.
www.thewrap.com www.thewrap.com
Click to expand...
I've never heard of The Wrap or the author of this piece, but they win the snarky columnist award for this one:

"...Disney’s Hollywood Studios, a park that had started as a place where you would go behind the scenes of film and television production and has, with the addition of “Star Wars”- and “Toy Story”-themed lands, become the Disney theme park equivalent of the drawer at home where you shove all the stuff you don’t have a place for."
Click to expand...
 
pdude81

pdude81

Well-Known Member
I love MV3D, but if it's going in a few years anyway, the retheming of that area for Monsters makes a lot of sense, and allows them to completely rework AC in a different way.

However, I also don't want to lose Mama Melrose for a Sushi restaurant. So many complex feelings
 
Smooth

Smooth

Well-Known Member
Spideeey_24 said:
Hello everyone! I’m new to the forums, so bear with me

My biggest hope if Monsters is replaced Grand Ave is that Disney heard all of the backlash about MuppetVision closing down and just move it where Lighting McQueen is at and put the film on Disney+

But hey, Disney has disappointed me before
Click to expand...
1723561439354.png
 
I

Ichabod Crane

Well-Known Member
ToTBellHop said:
Realistically, I can’t see Mermaid leaving yet, so in AC, it would feel more like a ride than a land. And they would keep that dead end in the park. At this point, I’d rather they wait until they have a concept large enough to justify clearing out everything back there to connect to Sunset Blvd. And they apparently do have such a concept.
Click to expand...
I’ve heard that they wouldn’t need to touch Mermaid right away and would leave it running for around a year or so after starting construction if they go with AC.

But yeah, I think part of the problem is that they really want something else for the AC plot.
 
S

SamEagle80

Active Member
Brian said:
I've never heard of The Wrap or the author of this piece, but they win the snarky columnist award for this one:
Click to expand...

Drew does an animation podcast with Jim Hill and worked with Disney at some point (something animation related but can't remember what). They talk about the parks on the podcast a decent amount and the comment you highlighted is a common theme - he's not a fan of what the parks have become.

This article really es me off. WDI purposefully omitted the closing at D23 because they knew it would get a negative reaction on stage. Cowards.
 
MerlinTheGoat

MerlinTheGoat

Well-Known Member
Moth said:
Once again, they're not replacing the only ride that has Darth Vader, arguably one of the, if not the most iconic villain in cinema, at the Star Wars park.
Click to expand...
To be fair, they have been recently showing versions of the film without Vader. For a while, they had replaced Vader with Kylo Ren, and currently (at least within the past 6 months), they just had a probe droid instead of either. So i'm not entirely sure how sacred even Vader is. They could also just create a scenario for the Falcon ride that contains Vader if they wanted. While that land is set in the sequel era, i'm not sure they care all that much about timeline continuity, since again they've been running Star Tour with multiple random eras spread across several generations (sometime even within the same film).
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom