I think you should read what you wrote earlier and this post.You need to read what I wrote again.
I’m talking about three decades;
1. Eisner’s last decade
2. Bob’s First Decade
3. Bob’s second decade.
1. Bad decisions, with weaning investment
2. Worse investment (lowest point)
3. Better
8B would place it more towards the good, not stagnant side. Significantly above 2004-14. 17B would be an amazing investment decade; at least in terms of capital. Decisions are one thing, stagnation another.
The billions is trying to fix it from being stagnant means the last two decades were in fact, stagnant.
They are playing catch up and rushing decisions because of stagnation. "Quick, we gave them star wars land already, too little too late so, give them the door coaster, but make it a land, a RNR retheme."
Proof is in the need.