News Monster Inc Land Coming to Disney's Hollywood Studios

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Am I seeing this right? We’re back to it’s too hot…so people don’t go to Florida again?

Right…it’s not at all the price…the upsell…and the uncomfortable environment Bob has intentionally create to bleed us all?

Can’t be that…wouldn’t result in an attendance lag that they have to admit publicly and to their financial detriment.

Nope
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
If Muppets goes, I lose all hope that Carousel of Progress is safe.

Nothing is sacred and there is no respect for the dead. Jim Henson doesn't matter and Walt Disney only matters when they can try and use him for marketing or selling tacky tchotckhes.
TWDC says nothing is sacred in WDW.

It’s not a matter of if COP goes, It’s a matter of when.

I stupidly thought COP was safe since they updated the seats.

They also updated the seats in Muppets and we see what’s going to happen there.

Super sad to think about this.
 

wdwmagic

Administrator
Moderator
Premium Member
Original Poster
The site that shall not be named has released another video and has now quadrupled down on his claim that it’s Animation Courtyard.

EDIT: Yes, quadrupled.

1.) D23 Video
2.) Article
3.) News Video
4.) Today’s D23 Video

He also said Mermaid is saying and some kind of transition will take place.
I am fairly convinced that at the moment, only a very small group of people know the location, and typically, they are high ranking and those people don't talk.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
If only there were parts of DHS that had shuttered attractions and expansion areas without removing an existing attraction....... lol
DHS has several development opportunities without removing anything except closed attractions and office space... and it seems like putting some organization into the park would be nice...like all the Pixar things in a contiguous area...in which case they could take advantage of this next construction project and start reorganizing the park in a sensical way... Perhaps Little Mermaid show should move to the Sounds Dangerous Superstar Television complex to allow Animation Courtyard to become a complete Pixar Studios area of Minilands....
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
I'd rather keep the River and Island than Muppets. But I also don't see a great reason why we should have to lose either to grow the parks. They can both stay and there's still plenty of space to expand.

I do wonder why they don't open the store. I have to imagine that would help sales of Muppets merchandise.

If they are considering removing something to build this, then it's not just about finding a space for it, it's about what can they get rid of.
 

danlb_2000

Premium Member
Probably not. The earliest permits that get filed (like those just filed for the Magic Kingdom) are for water management. Both sites are already rather built up so there should not be a need for changes to the park’s water management strategy.

Yep, we would likely see closure announcement before permits.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
MisterT_pain.jpg
 

Surferboy567

Well-Known Member
I am fairly convinced that at the moment, only a very small group of people know the location, and typically, they are high ranking and those people don't talk.
I don't necessarily believe what he is saying but it's important to note because he has been right before.

I also get the feeling no one really knows besides those on the project or in affected areas.
 

lazyboy97o

Well-Known Member
Unless it has been done for both locations, at least to the point of being able to make a decision on its ultimate location, and before the full design is done.
I genuinely hope not as it would be irresponsible. Location is information you do need fairly early in design. It would mean one of two things: they approved and announced even earlier than they normally do in the process, or they spent money developing two different designs way beyond when they should have decided on a location. One of the biggest obstacles to cost and timelines is indecision and such scenarios would mean they’re indulging even more.
 

CoasterFan27

Active Member
I genuinely hope not as it would be irresponsible. Location is information you do need fairly early in design. It would mean one of two things: they approved and announced even earlier than they normally do in the process, or they spent money developing two different designs way beyond when they should have decided on a location. One of the biggest obstacles to cost and timelines is indecision and such scenarios would mean they’re indulging even more.
That's just not right. Sometimes two options are equal and you need further design work to understand the differences.

Real life example if you don't believe me, look at any major highways planning documents and you'll often see multiple routes considered and designed enough to understand impacts etc.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I am fairly convinced that at the moment, only a very small group of people know the location, and typically, they are high ranking and those people don't talk.
Which has always been the way it actually is
There are lower level people who have to know in order to do actual design work.
…and then there’s the Orlandites…who fail to look outside their windows and notice they’re in Orlando and the Fortune 500 isn’t coming to claim them
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom