I like Tomorrowland 94……I'd much rather they spend the money to retheme Astro Orbiter and replace its 94 aesthetic with something new, than retheme Aladdin to Moana
BRING IT BACK
I like Tomorrowland 94……I'd much rather they spend the money to retheme Astro Orbiter and replace its 94 aesthetic with something new, than retheme Aladdin to Moana
Not convincing.Because it's ugly eye sore in the middle of the land and any capacity lost from it could easily be absorbed into Moana's and BBT.
No, they didn’t. That’s not what I’m referring to. That didn’t solve the problem Aladdin solves.They did. 12 years ago.
Maybe to you, I love the views from riding it I'd say it has the best visual atmosphere while riding it vs contrast to Paris and Tokyo. It doesn't bother me only because I'm an Aladdin fan. It be great though if an Aladdin area be built even bigger more in the west edge side of MK.alladdin spinner is the ugliest part of MK and DSP/AW
A Zamperla Aero Combat is advertised as having a theoretical hourly capacity of 420 people from an instantaneous capacity of 24 people (12 vehicles holding 2 riders). The Magic Carpets have an instantaneous capacity of 64 peoples (16 vehicles holding 4 riders). It should easily be doing more than 400 people an hour.Isn't the hourly for Carpets only like 400 guests? (on a good day)
Cool.A Zamperla Aero Combat is advertised as having a theoretical hourly capacity of 420 people from an instantaneous capacity of 24 people (12 vehicles holding 2 riders). The Magic Carpets have an instantaneous capacity of 64 peoples (16 vehicles holding 4 riders). It should easily be doing more than 400 people an hour.
Side note, the 16 arm spinner is a product Zamperla only makes for Disney.
Easily double thatIsn't the hourly for Carpets only like 400 guests? (on a good day)
Not according to this site. But then theoretical doesn't mean much. https://crooksinwdw.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/theoreticaloperational-hourly-ride-capacity-at-wdw/Easily double that
The numbers on that site are incredibly inaccurate.Not according to this site. But then theoretical doesn't mean much. https://crooksinwdw.wordpress.com/2013/12/14/theoreticaloperational-hourly-ride-capacity-at-wdw/
Ok.The numbers on that site are incredibly inaccurate.
Happy for WDI to hire me for any research purposes.
Fire Island (or whatever it was called) expansion plot. Expect an E-ticket level with POSSIBLE Shanghai pirates tech.
Don’t we know fairly definitively this is not Shanghai Pirates? Reminiscent of, sure. But it’s a different ride system entirely, hence the patents.
I’m under the impression the only place that might implement Shanghai’s tech is DCA’s Pandora.
That’s always been my impression. The Shanghai tech seems like it’s a bit much and unnecessary for a Moana attraction.
iirc it's like, the cousin to Shanghai pirates? Not the tech directly but with elements of it.Don’t we know fairly definitively this is not Shanghai Pirates? Reminiscent of, sure. But it’s a different ride system entirely, hence the patents.
I’m under the impression the only place that might implement Shanghai’s tech is DCA’s Pandora.
Why remove the spinner? The park needs more rides, not less. The traffic flow is not an issue and neither is the “immersion.”
I have always had trouble reading my parents too, always wound up with a spanking....I can't read parents well and relatively unfamiliar with the Shanghai pirates tech outside of the general gist of it, so that's on me reading the patents a bit wrong haha.
Steal Te Fiti's heart again and you'll get fire mountain!!!I’m glad this spot is likley getting filled. Such a shame fire mountain will never happen, looked like a cool idea. It’ll be a very cool ride, and is a guaranteed hit.
At least it’s getting its spot filled an a sucessor, same with villains mountain and the rumored land. That makes me feel better, like pandora with beastly kingdom.Steal Te Fiti's heart again and you'll get fire mountain!!!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.