Rumor Moana E-Ticket Ride to Adventureland

[FigmentFan82]

I think this should definitely be a priority for MK. Adventureland needs a little more and Moana is proving to be a solid IP. I really hope they don't cheap out on BBTM. It's ok if phase 2 takes a while but don't abandon it. Universal's ambitions are making Disney look like fools that can't read the room.

 

[999th Happy Haunt]

This would be a great fit. Don’t know how anyone could complain about it coming to MK.

 

[Sectorkeeper71]

The real question is, will the word "adventure" be included in the title of this attraction?

“Moana’s not in a bayou but actually the Pacific Ocean adventure: the ride”

 

[Starship824]

This would be a great fit. Don’t know how anyone could complain about it coming to MK.

People will find a way don't worry

 

[Tha Realest]

Or, hear me out: each new attraction and addition to capacity doesn’t need to come at the expense, or cannibalize, something that already exists.

“Expansion” need not come with a reduction in workforce/operations elsewhere in the same park. Expand the pie!

 

[erasure fan1]

Or, hear me out: each new attraction and addition to capacity doesn’t need to come at the expense, or cannibalize, something that already exists.

“Expansion” need not come with a reduction in workforce/operations elsewhere in the same park. Expand the pie!

I'm sorry, but that's just too wildly radical a concept for Disney to handle.

 

[Brer Panther]

Just please keep Moana out of Animal Kingdom.

 

[𝕴𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖓𝖊𝖊𝖗97]

It’s not going anywhere so it’s silly to even suggest to move it.

Well, there is precedent for moving spinners. They moved Flik's Flyers to Paradise Pier over in DCA. They also did it with Dumbo when they doubled it and shifted it to Storybook Circus. It's arguably one of the easiest Disney attractions to move.

 

[eddie104]

Well, there is precedent for moving spinners. They moved Flik's Flyers to Paradise Pier over in DCA. They also did it with Dumbo when they doubled it and shifted it to Storybook Circus. It's arguably one of the easiest Disney attractions to move.

Maybe they will if Moana eventually gets built.

 

[PREMiERdrum]

Well, there is precedent for moving spinners. They moved Flik's Flyers to Paradise Pier over in DCA. They also did it with Dumbo when they doubled it and shifted it to Storybook Circus. It's arguably one of the easiest Disney attractions to move.

The Disney of the 70s, 80s, or 90s would absolutely relocate it to improve themeatic cohesion and improve the overall product.

It's not moving.

 

[tanc]

Does this mean Swiss tree house is potentially on the chopping block? I just don't see anywhere else a "flume" ride could possibly go in AL.

 

[MerlinTheGoat]

Does this mean Swiss tree house is potentially on the chopping block? I just don't see anywhere else a "flume" ride could possibly go in AL.

No, the current proposed location is an empty plot of land south of the Pirates show building outside of the railroad track perimeter. The treehouse is nowhere near this and probably shouldn't be impacted at all (and I don't think it would provide remotely enough space to do what they want to do).

This plot of land was once considered for the canned Fire Mountain project, which would have had a new pathway built between the Pirates building and Jungle Cruise. So I could see something similar being done for Moana. But we'll see I guess (assuming it even happens).

 

[tanc]

I've heard this flume might be proposed to DL Paris as well, but wouldn't it sort of conflict with TBA in MK? I wouldn't mind if it was just a dark ride similar to some of the ones in Fantasy Springs.

 

[Tha Realest]

No, the current proposed location is an empty plot of land south of the Pirates show building outside of the railroad track perimeter. The treehouse is nowhere near this and probably shouldn't be impacted at all (and I don't think it would provide remotely enough space to do what they want to do).

View attachment 785747

This plot of land was once considered for the canned Fire Mountain project, which would have had a new pathway built between the Pirates building and Jungle Cruise. So I could see something similar being done for Moana. But we'll see I guess (assuming it even happens).

View attachment 785750

wasn’t this also the location for the rumored “in park” hotel?

 

[ToTBellHop]

Already losing a spinner in Dinoland. In a theoretical world where that’s rebuilt in another park (not saying it will be), they certainly wouldn’t then consider moving a second spinner concurrently.

Also, Adventureland is already a mixed up land with several IPs. No need to make two Moana rides nor would they want to retheme that whole plaza.

Crowded, cramped Adventurelands are as Disney as Mickey Waffles.

 

[erasure fan1]

Just please keep Moana out of Animal Kingdom.

Hey! I saw a fish, bird, crab, pig and a chicken! That all the justification needed.

 

[Twirlnhurl]

The Disney of the 70s, 80s, or 90s would absolutely relocate it to improve themeatic cohesion and improve the overall product.

It's not moving.

Disney also relocated the Lion King show to Africa in DAK in the teens, so I think it is still possible if it makes sense.

I don't know if this is the time for it, though (as much as I wish it was).

 

[MerlinTheGoat]

They also relocated and doubled the Dumbo spinner during Fantasyland Expansion. Not that I'd assume they'd do that again with the Aladdin spinner, but I don't know.

 

[ToTBellHop]

Disney also relocated the Lion King show to Africa in DAK in the teens, so I think it is still possible if it makes sense.

I don't know if this is the time for it, though (as much as I wish it was).

That was unique because of the kind of money Avatar had behind it. Moana would not be funded at that level.

 

[PREMiERdrum]

Disney also relocated the Lion King show to Africa in DAK in the teens, so I think it is still possible if it makes sense.

I don't know if this is the time for it, though (as much as I wish it was).

I'm not talking about if they should or shouldn't or might or might not.

They aren't.