ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
I would hate-ride the hell out of Superstar Limo. That after a couple glasses of wine sounds like a great Saturday to me.If it were up to some people we'd still have Superstar Limo and Ellen's Energy Slumber.
I would hate-ride the hell out of Superstar Limo. That after a couple glasses of wine sounds like a great Saturday to me.If it were up to some people we'd still have Superstar Limo and Ellen's Energy Slumber.
It's basically the equivalent of watching E! after 9pm.I would hate-ride the hell out of Superstar Limo. That after a couple glasses of wine sounds like a great Saturday to me.
The coaster is 1 minuteA simulator, a retheme, a 40 second coaster, and a boat ride-simulator hybrid. I mean...it's something I guess.
Bet?I don't think even the hardest hard-shell shellfish on these boards would be upset if Carpets were removed.
Bonus: Does anyone know what I'm referencing when I say "hardest hard-shell shellfish?" It's a really deep non-Disney movie reference.
rest my case @𝕴𝖒𝖆𝖌𝖎𝖓𝖊𝖊𝖗97Or, hear me out: each new attraction and addition to capacity doesn’t need to come at the expense, or cannibalize, something that already exists.
“Expansion” need not come with a reduction in workforce/operations elsewhere in the same park. Expand the pie!
If it were up to some people we'd still have Superstar Limo and Ellen's Energy Slumber.
No more bizarre than Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride, honestly…I loved SuperStart Limo . It was horrible, and amazing.
well...like a cringeworthy B-list celebrity caricature Mr Toad without the humor or speed.....No more bizarre than Mr. Toad’s Wild Ride, honestly…
I think it was actually the sequel attraction to Toad; you just spent the entire time in hell while on superstar limowell...like a cringeworthy B-list celebrity caricature Mr Toad without the humor or speed.....
It was the closest I’ve ever gotten to Whoopi Goldberg and Regis Philbin.I think it was actually the sequel attraction to Toad; you just spent the entire time in hell while on superstar limo
I was convinced he’d make me a millionaire one day…OMG Regis...I had completely forgotten him....lol
Had you been closer to Jackie Chan and funnyman Tim Allen?It was the closest I’ve ever gotten to Whoopi Goldberg and Regis Philbin.
I don't think Moana is meant to be comparable to Tiana's in terms of thrill, I suspect they will indeed want the height requirement to be lower. Probably somewhere between Pirates and Splash for drop height, with the height requirement similarly splitting the difference somehow. But that's sort of a guess.I'll interject briefly here. I've seen no one raise the obvious objection towards building a new Moana flume ride in Adventureland.
Flume rides mean that younger guests might be unable to go on the attraction. I assume that this Moana attraction is aimed at appealing to young children who enjoy the Moana film on Disney+. If so, a flume ride with a height requirement similar toSplash MountainTiana's Bayou Adventure (40 Inches) would disqualify many guests that this attraction would appeal to. I double checked the CDC guidance on what to expect for height measurements of children. It looks like most 4 year old girls would be unable to ride an attraction with a 40 Inch height limit. Even a portion of 5 year old girls would be losing out on the chance to see Moana. We could foresee a ride with a less-intense drop that could result in a lower height limit. But you'd still be cutting out 3 year old girls. And even if the ride can be safely ridden by these guests, there's no guarantee it would be enjoyable for the important 4-5 year old demographic.
If a Moana ride gets built, I expect it will be accessible to as many guests as possible. Disney's incentive is to provide an attraction similar to what they've just built at Fantasy Springs at Tokyo Disney Sea. Those rides are impressive, but they are not physically taxing. They prioritize audio animatronics, special effects, and music.
I could be totally misreading this, but I think they would be making a mistake to build a thrill ride when families really want something that is accessible to everyone. Just my two cents on the matter.
I am under a court order to ignore that question.Had you been closer to Jackie Chan and funnyman Tim Allen?
I would be shocked if a Moana flume ride had a 40 inch height requirement. I suspect the drop wouldn't be anything like Tiana/Splash. I'm sure there'd be a mild thrill, but I would expect it to be very much something that younger kids could experience. But I have no inside knowledge of the project...that's just what I assume.I'll interject briefly here. I've seen no one raise the obvious objection towards building a new Moana flume ride in Adventureland.
Flume rides mean that younger guests might be unable to go on the attraction. I assume that this Moana attraction is aimed at appealing to young children who enjoy the Moana film on Disney+. If so, a flume ride with a height requirement similar toSplash MountainTiana's Bayou Adventure (40 Inches) would disqualify many guests that this attraction would appeal to. I double checked the CDC guidance on what to expect for height measurements of children. It looks like most 4 year old girls would be unable to ride an attraction with a 40 Inch height limit. Even a portion of 5 year old girls would be losing out on the chance to see Moana. We could foresee a ride with a less-intense drop that could result in a lower height limit. But you'd still be cutting out 3 year old girls. And even if the ride can be safely ridden by these guests, there's no guarantee it would be enjoyable for the important 4-5 year old demographic.
If a Moana ride gets built, I expect it will be accessible to as many guests as possible. Disney's incentive is to provide an attraction similar to what they've just built at Fantasy Springs at Tokyo Disney Sea. Those rides are impressive, but they are not physically taxing. They prioritize audio animatronics, special effects, and music.
I could be totally misreading this, but I think they would be making a mistake to build a thrill ride when families really want something that is accessible to everyone. Just my two cents on the matter.
My 3 year old is tall enough now for Kali River Rapids (38 inches). So my guess is it that would be the requirement if any.I would be shocked if a Moana flume ride had a 40 inch height requirement. I suspect they drop wouldn't be anything like Tiana/Splash. I'm sure there'd be a mild thrill, but I would expect it to be very much something that younger kids could experience. But I have no inside knowledge of the project...that's just what I assume.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.