In more than one scenario, yes.I've heard this statement before, but i'm curious as to how dire the situation was. Do you mean that prior to Potter there was a legitimate danger of USO closing and being demolished?
In more than one scenario, yes.I've heard this statement before, but i'm curious as to how dire the situation was. Do you mean that prior to Potter there was a legitimate danger of USO closing and being demolished?
Woah.In more than one scenario, yes.
Comcast do, but it was GE back in the mid to late 2000s who were the majority share holder. Potter was a last ditch, everything in the ring attempt to turn the resort around.Woah.
I knew the parks weren't doing fantastically prior to Potter, but I didn't know it was THAT serious. Though granted my first visit to USO was in 2016, and it seemed to be a thriving level of attendance by then.
I'm assuming given their expansion plans that Comcast has actual sustained faith in USO now.
Yeah I know it has changed hands a couple of times. But I figured that Comcast would just sell USO off to someone else again rather than consider closure and demolition. Unless there were no takers or something. It's hard to think today that just a few years prior the park was struggling so badly. REALLY turned things around. I'm glad they seem motivated now.Comcast do, but it was GE back in the mid to late 2000s who were the majority share holder. Potter was a last ditch, everything in the ring attempt to turn the resort around.
Absolutely true. Vortex turned off. Fire effects turned off. Minimal Ln2 in use. Single track MIB even at peak.USO Team Members would regularly admit that they were cutting costs leading up to Potter. One example was the water cyclone in Poseidon's Fury. While this story is circumstantial I had a team member tell me it was off because management didn't want to pay for it.
Absolutely true. Vortex turned off. Fire effects turned off. Minimal Ln2 in use. Single track MIB even at peak.
What? I think you're still mad that I keep proving you wrong all the timeThat’s opinion for you.
What? I think you're still mad that I keep proving you wrong all the time
I’m thankful you shot down that nonsense talk about gondolas and you were the only one right about the Beauty and the Beast ride coming to the France Pavilion.What? I think you're still mad that I keep proving you wrong all the time
I’m thankful you shot down that nonsense talk about gondolas and you were the only one right about the Beauty and the Beast ride coming to the France Pavilion.
I'm sure more news will come up during next years D23 Expo.Disney can use Marvel at DLR and all they have is the re themed ToT. I know DCA is supposed to get a mini-Land but it’s taking a long time to develop it if they want the IP in the parks.
I'm sure more news will come up during next years D23 Expo.
So far that’s only a cosmetic makeover.They will also be starting work on Marvel land at Disneyland Paris, so it wouldn’t surprise me if we see a clone or two (because money) when it comes to the attractions and it’s heavily discussed at D23 next year.
And it will somehow cost €427,628,924.47.So far that’s only a cosmetic makeover.
UO has to perform regular upkeep on the Marvel themed area as per the contract, IIRC. Ultimately, I agree. Comcast wants 100% of Sky, and things like the Marvel theme park rights are a pittance against the value of that company. They may not agree to an immediate relinquishment, but I can see the contract being amended to put a final end date for reversion (amongst other assets being transferred, etc.). That would also give UO time to consider a replacement attraction. In the larger scheme of things, those rights are a small price to pay for their parent company to replicate its business model internationally.I’m quite aware of the updates to Spider-Man and the Hulk coaster. I think they chose to update them for a handful of reasons, but should Disney gain the Sky acquisition from Fox they could use that as a bargaining chip to obtain the theme park rights from Comcast.
It's a really good thing they didn't. The success of the parks were one of the highlights of Comcast's last quarterly report, and really highlights why they are being so aggressive in expanding in Orlando. I was watching TheTimTracker on YouTube, and he was doing a room tour at Cabana Bay in one of the towers overlooking Volcano Bay. The view was absolutely stunning. UO has been kind of off of my radar, but after seeing that, now I'm really considering taking a trip there in the next year or two. That gives me considerable reason to be excited for what will come next with their new park by Lockheed Martin.Yeah I know it has changed hands a couple of times. But I figured that Comcast would just sell USO off to someone else again rather than consider closure and demolition. Unless there were no takers or something. It's hard to think today that just a few years prior the park was struggling so badly. REALLY turned things around. I'm glad they seem motivated now.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.