GhostlyGoofy
Well-Known Member
He's allowed a phone. It just has to be this one. (Which he probably stole too!)When he definitely starts trying to make some deal for a reduced sentence, can one of the terms be that his mom takes his phone away?
He's allowed a phone. It just has to be this one. (Which he probably stole too!)When he definitely starts trying to make some deal for a reduced sentence, can one of the terms be that his mom takes his phone away?
This was on Blaytin's public orange county docs page. Does anyone more fluent in legalese know what this means. Sounds like he has to hand over anything that could be considered evidence.View attachment 375569
I was gonna study pre law at Rollins, but now I'll just keep reading the replies to this thread.
I was gonna study pre law at Rollins, but now I'll just keep reading the replies to this thread.
I have respect for honest people, people who put others before themselves, and people who risk their lives to protect the public. Thieves can rot.... I have to say I have respect for people who actively try to shake things up.
I was gonna study pre law at Rollins, but now I'll just keep reading the replies to this thread.
I kinda wish his friends would post on here to stand up for him or "Stitch" on him. haha"It will all work out for me in the end, you'll see!"
Um... how? Even if you are acquitted, it is clear that you are simply a parasite with an unhealthy obsession of Disney. We all see that now regardless of how any trial goes. You're a bad guy *now*, and acquittal doesn't affect that.
Sure, you gotta link?When pictures of me with the stolen goods appear on my phone... yeah ok it looks bad. But I am innocent. Buy a BDD shirt.
Well, hopefully she still lets him to Podcasts!! hahaWhen he definitely starts trying to make some deal for a reduced sentence, can one of the terms be that his mom takes his phone away?
I kinda wish his friends would post on here to stand up for him...
This was on Blaytin's public orange county docs page. Does anyone more fluent in legalese know what this means. Sounds like he has to hand over anything that could be considered evidence.View attachment 375569
I was gonna study pre law at Rollins, but now I'll just keep reading the replies to this thread.
That's why I am just reading the comments!Rollins is a mediocre law school at best... but this is a common thing. The defense always demands discovery.
I just want to know who is paying these obscene prices for random stolen animatronic clothing?!
I consider myself to be a pretty hardcore Disney Parks nerd (as we all are here really by definition), but that is just strange.
Look up Richard Kraft's Disneyland collection. Which he just sold for 8 million. There's a market out there for this kind of stuff. And some people will do some shady things to get a piece of it.
Mr. Robert Kraft has been in the news a lot more than he wishes lately, I'm sure.Read it too fast and looked up Robert Kraft Disney collection..... couldn’t find a thing about Disney. Found out a lot more about Robert Kraft. Lol
Why are people here arguing about this? I might be missing something. To me, stealing is wrong, period, and that's that?
Read it too fast and looked up Robert Kraft Disney collection..... couldn’t find a thing about Disney. Found out a lot more about Robert Kraft. Lol
I don't know. I doubt he'd be auctioning off and hosting an exhibit around it, if any of it was swiped.He never obtained any of that by nefarious means though, right?
Now this was funny. Any thoughts much beyond this will not work on a family board.Richard Kraft-SELLER.
Robert Kraft-BUYER.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.