Slowjack
Well-Known Member
That doesn't work. The only time they would be implementing this policy is when there aren't enough tables for every group with food, and every group in the queue. If there were enough tables for that, the policy would be pointless so it's not in effect then. So the two choices are:In a word, yes. I don't see any problem with it at all. When you get to the restaurant, have your family get a table. Why do 4 people need to stand in line to place an order?
1. Everyone with food gets a table. No one without food gets a table.
2. Some people with food, and some people without food, hold tables. Other people, including people who already have food, don't get tables.
Given those two choices, why do you think 2 is the overall better policy?