That is a bold statement (and italicized, font enlarged, etc.
).
No matter how intelligent and thoughtful you've replied in what follows, resorting to these wide-sweeping hyperbola-laden statements only detract from your overall argument. But I liked the aforementioned post too.
The reason I liked that post is because it implied the following argument:
Voting with your wallet and decreasing your visits DOES in fact make another's experience better. . . because you are not in line ahead of them anymore. In fact, if more people make your decision, and stick to it, then their visits would continue to improve.
For me, the single biggest problem with WDW is that too many people go there. For me, it's a bigger problem than lack of themed expansions, a bigger problem than rising costs, a bigger problem than upkeep, trash, food quality. . . and anything else I could ever come up with to gripe about.
I only visit WDW, on average, every three years or so. The status quo and current expansion/upkeep efforts of every aspect of the WDW experience is just fine by me, and largely go unnoticed. . . except the crowds. I notice them alot, so if a bunch of APs (I assume) start boycotting based on data mining, then great!
I thought Bolt's summed it up perfectly.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Now, as for the original intent of the thread, I have no problem being tracked at the WDW setting. They will use their data to offer me exactly what they think I want. . . but, I am a grown intelligent human being, and I have always had the right to say "no" to any expense I do not want.
For example, if I am data-mined and WDW determined that I spent tons of time in New Fantasyland, they may send me an email with a special offer for New Fantasyland merch. Right up my alley, right?
But. . . I don't have to buy it!