TP2000
Well-Known Member
It’s not a question of giving her a pass, but of keeping things in perspective. Some of you are holding her to a higher standard than you did the former president! She’s a young person who made some (in my view) simplistic comments about an old film; it really isn’t a big deal in the whole scheme of things.
Your issue seems to be mainly with the media, who have been making this a story for the past week or so. Stories below are just from the past 12 hours, so ripped from the day's headlines literally.
I can't think of another example like this, can you? Where the lead actor in a big Hollywood movie goes on PR interviews and trashes the beloved source material that built the studio she is currently working for?
In my opinion, she has done a bad job of PR for her upcoming movie. If these were her Talking Points the studio vetted for her, the studio is to blame. If these are really her honest opinions on the original 1937 movie and how she feels she will make it better, then that's a shame. But I still think the worst case scenario is that Disney actually approved these Talking Points for her for planned interviews.
Or at the very least, after Miss Zegler made unflattering, ungracious, and off-script comments about the original movie during heavily managed press interviews, Disney should have asked the various media outfits to strike those comments from the record.
How a New Disney Princess Managed to Piss Off Both Disney Fans and Conservatives
An unholy union has come together to criticize Rachel Zegler for her comments about the 1937 film Snow White.
slate.com
The internet is up in arms over Disneyâs live-action âSnow Whiteâ remake â hereâs why
Many are criticizing the new ‘Snow White’ for being ‘too woke’ — is it?
www.deseret.com
Fresh controversy over Disney's Snow White remake
In resurfaced videos, Zegler revealed she was no fan of Disney's 1937 classic 'Snow White and the Seven Dwarves' and said there would be changes to the prince in the upcoming reboot.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Last edited: