ford91exploder
Resident Curmudgeon
BUT FP+ is spread so thin and of so little value, I don't think it's going to be much of a draw for anyone to stay onsite. We've been thinking of going offsite after our next trip, and getting early reservation access to a single FP+ of value at HS/Epcot and 3 a day at MK (way too little) or AK (where we've never needed them anyway) isn't remotely valuable enough for us to even be a factor in the decision. I agree with your numbers, but not the underlying assumption: I don't think WDW hotels are going to see any increase in occupancy because of the earlier access to FP+ that an onsite stay offers. To the contrary, with the constant cost increases in ticket prices and hotel stays (and the corresponding lack of new attractions until Avatarland opens), I think occupancy may go down unless WDW is able to compensate by enticing guests with discount offers.
I think Disney needs to hire some good actuaries and recompute room pricing as they keep piling on price increases until no one wants to stay there unless they get a 'Discount' non-US guests get huge discounts on room/dining/ticket prices, I'd wager that the majority of guests at any point in time are non-US, But the US guests are paying rack rates for lodging/dining/tickets.
Making the 'street think that EVERYONE is paying these prices. I wonder how many of these so called 'Analysts' are actually doing anything other than reading pressers and SEC filings.