lazyboy97o
Well-Known Member
Wait times increasing greater than attendance.Sure, fine. And what is the trend, exactly, that you're referring to?
Wait times increasing greater than attendance.Sure, fine. And what is the trend, exactly, that you're referring to?
Sure, fine. And what is the trend, exactly, that you're referring to?
Evidence? Don't forget there are a lot.of seasonal / college part year.employees.
Sure, point taken. I just think that there are probably multiple variables involved, not just a single one.
Sure, point taken. I just think that there are probably multiple variables involved, not just a single one.
If you listen to the DISUnplugged podcast with Len, he mentions 5% as the amount of downtime that gets his model closer to what they've observed. It's some here and there, and some days a ride down 50%. Disney's 2016 annual report mentions efficiency improvements at domestic parks - take that for what it is. Attendance overall is up quite a bit since 2014 - probably 5% at MK, a lot more at AK, but Pandora absorbs a lot of that.How much is it down by?
Take Dumbo, e.g., it can have both spinners running or just one. If it's just one, it's capacity has been reduced 50%. But other attractions, like Little Mermaid, don't have a half-capacity reduced staffing option.
Now, let's say half the attractions can be run at half capacity. The total capacity for the park is 25% down.
Is that enough to spike wait times to 60%? Yes indeed. The example you quoted from me works both ways. An increase in attendance can have a disproportionate effect on line wait once you pass the "tipping point."
In the same way, a small decrease in throughput, if it causes the park to hit its tipping point, can also have a disproportionate effect on wait times.
But, here are questions which I've asked and no one is answering, or has the info for:
Also, remember, winter time is refurb time, that is baked-in reduced throughput every winter.
- Didn't WDW reduce staff in the winter in previous years? Were they operating at full capacity in late January 2014? If it's the same reduced staffing as before, than the difference is the crowds, which if it is passing the tipping point, has an oversized impact on lines. Did TouringPlans discover that throughput is down more so this winter than last winter? Is the lowered throughput calculated by physically looking at the ride's operation or counting the number of people leaving the ride per hour, or being based on looking at the wait time, which can be affected by attendance numbers?
- When we're talking about reduced capacity by reduced staffing, by how much? Does reduced staffing mean a 10% cut in throughput? 30%? 60%?
I'm sure WDW is seeing the 60% jump in wait times, whether because of increased crowds or reduced staffing or a combination of both. The question here is: Are they scrambling to hire more people or not? And if they are, how fast can they restaff?
But why does it always come down to that? The parks are quite profitable and they are trying to push the profit margin higher. What's an acceptable margin? Where does it end? If they want the margin 2 points higher this year, then why not 4 next year? It's not a zero sum game. They're trying to create more profit, not make ends meet.Here's my question: what would people prefer, a reduction in staff increasing waits & degrading other service, or increases in ticket prices?
If you listen to the DISUnplugged podcast with Len, he mentions 5% as the amount of downtime that gets his model closer to what they've observed. It's some here and there, and some days a ride down 50%. Disney's 2016 annual report mentions efficiency improvements at domestic parks - take that for what it is. Attendance overall is up quite a bit since 2014 - probably 5% at MK, a lot more at AK, but Pandora absorbs a lot of that.
I did a rough estimate what a 1% staffing reduction would be. They've got ~63k employees, say 5/7 day shift, so 45k working each day, 2x share for MK, 1x Epcot, HS, AK, 2x for hotels total, so 45/7 = 6400, so MK is around 12,800 employees/day. A 1% reduction is 128 less employees per day. Say a half-day shift, that's 64 less CMs in the park.
Here's my question: what would people prefer, a reduction in staff increasing waits & degrading other service, or increases in ticket prices?
fOr rEaLz????? These are the two options? !!!!Here's my question: what would people prefer, a reduction in staff increasing waits & degrading other service, or increases in ticket prices?
Here's my question: what would people prefer, a reduction in staff increasing waits & degrading other service, or increases in ticket prices?
Here's my question: what would people prefer, a reduction in staff increasing waits & degrading other service, or increases in ticket prices?
just throwing this out here but wouldnt Disney want people not in lines but out in the park spending money?
I thought it was all about eliminating the gaming of the system, first I heard of the ACA coming into play. How so? Most CTs wouldnt hit the 30, right?You mentioned something that has been detrimental to staffing: Disney has lost a huge percentage of seasonal (CT—Casual Temporary) CMs. The changing tax laws and Obamacare health care affected that. I won’t get into details because it opens a huge can of worms, but even though some of the changes were based on local people’s working a couple shifts a year and taking advantage of free admission, the majority of CTs were college program alumni who returned during the summer and winter breaks for a dose of the Magic. When the requirements jumped to 150 hours every 6 months (and at least 300 hours/year), most of these college students couldn’t commit. CT staffing plummeted.
The standard defenseAgain... if this was simply an 'oops' - Disney would have corrected. This is not a few day sample... this is a progressing TREND, for which Disney has the ability to turn around. But has not.
Attendance at this time of year is WAY BELOW maximum. So its within Disney's abilities with existing services to combat any such 'unexpected increases'. But instead the trend is ACCELERATING.
What's the defense for that again??
fOr rEaLz????? These are the two options? *****!!!!
Bee tee dubz.....
Disney is already raising ticket prices and reducing staff. So I guess from a guests perspective the answer to your question is neither. But to Disney the answer is BOTH!!! Pay me sucka!!!
I thought it was all about eliminating the gaming of the system, first I heard of the ACA coming into play. How so? Most CTs wouldnt hit the 30, right?
Thanks
Merch sales are down because the market is oversaturated, and the theme parks merchandise is overpriced and rather generic. I can go to Amazon, Target, Kohl’s, the Disney Store, Macy’s, Hot Topic, and more and get Disney clothing that’s priced better than what’s in the parks.An interesting question...
My thought...for a long time (you've read it before)...is that the mechandise sales are starting to diminish greatly and they know it. If true...that could mean that they predict cost cutting/price gouging to be a better long term course...
Just a theory.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.