the.dreamfinder
Well-Known Member
By that reasoning, Android is a Linux clone.Goodness, a pretty skinner BDS unix clone is not innovation, its marketing and Apple does it very well.
By that reasoning, Android is a Linux clone.Goodness, a pretty skinner BDS unix clone is not innovation, its marketing and Apple does it very well.
Re Pixar recent decline:Pixar wasn't exactly been firing on all cylinders during Lasseter's final years at the top. The creative high points like Coco and Inside Out were increasingly fewer and further between, and its hard to know how much Lasseter personally had to do with them. I think the last film he directed and wrote for was Cars 2.
First, it's BSD - and that's only the kernel (Darwin). Let's not forget what Apple DOES add to the OS - the APIs (of which there are at least 100). The UI is not a "skin" as you call it; it doesn't even run X11. It's based on OpenGL and Metal, supports Carbon (or rather, used to) and Cocoa and has APIs for all of the above. I'm guessing you didn't quite follow along with the evolution of NeXTstep to OpenStep to Rhapsody to Mac OS X. All the apps on the Unix side are mostly GNU or other open source (but that can be said of BSD, Linux or other OSes (especially the Server components; e.g. Apache w/WebDav, Postfix, Bind, etc.).Goodness, a pretty skinner BDS unix clone is not innovation, its marketing and Apple does it very well.
You need to make some more friends. Android outsells IOS by a tremendous margin. Obviously there are still a lot of technologically challenged people that use iPhones and that's OK.Off topic, but a reply to this post, out of everyone I know, like 2 people don’t have an iPhone. I am an iPhone fan, but seems, even more so lately, most people at least that I know, have switched to iPhone.
You need to make some more friends. Android outsells IOS by a tremendous margin. Obviously there are still a lot of technologically challenged people that use iPhones and that's OK.
He helped produce and approved everything though. His signature is literally on evey modern Disney and Pixar classic.Pixar wasn't exactly been firing on all cylinders during Lasseter's final years at the top. The creative high points like Coco and Inside Out were increasingly fewer and further between, and its hard to know how much Lasseter personally had to do with them. I think the last film he directed and wrote for was Cars 2.
You need to make some more friends. Android outsells IOS by a tremendous margin. Obviously there are still a lot of technologically challenged people that use iPhones and that's OK.
Funny most people in my circle have switched to Android after getting sick of their iPhones.Off topic, but a reply to this post, out of everyone I know, like 2 people don’t have an iPhone. I am an iPhone fan, but seems, even more so lately, most people at least that I know, have switched to iPhone.
Would be interesting to know. I find the recent reliance on sequels a particularly odd development. Obviously it makes sense from a financial standpoint, but the idea with Lasseter was that he was almost alone as a creative with enough power to stand up to the accountants down in Burbank. Yet Pixar has ended up following the strategy of what were considered far less prestige animation studios by churning out sequel after sequel of their big hits. It wouldn't be surprising if this was a result of new creative voices being stifled and the veterans increasingly phoning it in which you'd imagine reflected a culture that did not welcome new voices or encourage innovation. Who knows if that's true, though.Re Pixar recent decline:
To what degree was it caused by excessive sequels, Lasseter creating a unwelcoming culture towards new voices and veterans feeling spent and tapping out?
I believe it is more to do with the Iger strategy of franchises. Cars, Toy Story need content to carry their franchises. From lands at the parks to the junk filling the $0.99 trays at discount supermarkets.Would be interesting to know. I find the recent reliance on sequels a particularly odd development. Obviously it makes sense from a financial standpoint, but the idea with Lasseter was that he was almost alone as a creative with enough power to stand up to the accountants down in Burbank. Yet Pixar has ended up following the strategy of what were considered far less prestige animation studios by churning out sequel after sequel of their big hits. It wouldn't be surprising if this was a result of new creative voices being stifled and the veterans increasingly phoning it in which you'd imagine reflected a culture that did not welcome new voices or encourage innovation. Who knows if that's true, though.
Yet there’s never a discussion regarding whether something enriches the whole.I believe it is more to do with the Iger strategy of franchises. Cars, Toy Story need content to carry their franchises. From lands at the parks to the junk filling the $0.99 trays at discount supermarkets.
Yet there’s never a discussion regarding whether something enriches the whole.
I don’t keep up with phone sale statistics. Only stating that in my personal experience, I have watched my messages turn blue, from green a lot these past couple of years. No need to be snarky. Have a great day and back to topic- I would at least hope Lassater is back for the opening of Toy Story Land and hopefully Toy Story 4.You need to make some more friends. Android outsells IOS by a tremendous margin. Obviously there are still a lot of technologically challenged people that use iPhones and that's OK.
I would at least hope Lassater is back for the opening of Toy Story Land and hopefully Toy Story 4.
If I was, I certainly wouldn’t be answering posts on a Disney fan site. Unless, I also was representing people accused of the same sort of thing, that hold much higher offices. With that, ya’ll have fun. Geez, you take stuff, way too seriously. Maybe you guys need to chill, a shot. Have a Magical Day though!Are you his lawyer?
Based on the fact there are settlements, he likely sexually assaulted women.If I was, I certainly wouldn’t be answering posts on a Disney fan site. Unless, I also was representing people accused of the same sort of thing, that hold much higher offices. With that, ya’ll have fun. Geez, you take stuff, way too seriously. Maybe you guys need to chill, a shot. Have a Magical Day though!
If we base things upon lawsuits, payoffs and or settlements, maybe our country should hold itself, to Disney’s standards.Based on the fact there are settlements, he likely sexually assaulted women.
Disney has survived without Walt- but I miss his influence.If Apple can survive without Steve Jobs, Pixar can survive without John. I'm hopeful we'll see more of Pete Docter in the future.
This is shameful.Now the Wall St Journalis suggesting Lasseter might actually return...
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.