Epcot82Guy
Well-Known Member
I think it's 100% fair to call it an attraction. But, it is replacing something that had (in theory) larger capacity for the same general type of attraction. And, it then becomes fair to highlight the other attractions of Epcot that don't get much billing - like all the cultural representation in WS. But, it is fairly classified as an attraction.
The one argument I call total BS on is the shade argument. This attraction has far more less shade that its predecessor. As its predecessor was an indoor, air conditioned building.
The one argument I call total BS on is the shade argument. This attraction has far more less shade that its predecessor. As its predecessor was an indoor, air conditioned building.