That's open to debate...What could be done? Tell a good, consistent story. The Good Dinosaur would not magically become a better movie by dropping in Buzz and Woody.
That's open to debate...What could be done? Tell a good, consistent story. The Good Dinosaur would not magically become a better movie by dropping in Buzz and Woody.
Maybe it didn’t need any.What other alternatives would be in the bag for Paradise Pier, if Pixar Pier is not the suitable option?
It may just be me, and it probably isn’t on the table, but I believe the Indiana Jones IP could make a really great thrilling boat ride to go along with a ride similar to Disneyland’s but different for the sake of being unique. That being said I believe Indiana Jones could fit in AK or DHS. DHS is kind of a dumping ground for popular IPs so why not Dr Jones. Those 2 rides would make a really nice enjoyable land.
The Shanghai PotC tech would mesh very well with a number of attractions.Many of us have suggested that the Shanghai POTC tech would mesh very well with an IJ attraction.
Polynesian birds, Caribbean pirates and a cruise through the jungle are a cohesive theme. I think you may be confusing setting for theme.This is 100% true... until you take off your everything-was-better-when-Walt-Disney-was-alive glasses and realize that we now are starting to see a level of immersive theming that had never been conceived of when the Disney parks first started. Everyone loves to tear apart the smallest use of creative license these days, but nobody seemed to care that Polynesian birds, Caribbean pirates, and jungle animals all live peacefully together in a land that is supposed to have a cohesive theme. Not that I don’t like Adventureland (or Fantasyland or Tomorrowland, for that matter), but let’s not pretend that the standards for themed entertainment have been getting lower!
Yep, that’s because the tech is good... lolThe Shanghai PotC tech would mesh very well with a number of attractions.
SDL pirates technology ride CONFIRMED!!!!!1!1!The Shanghai PotC tech would mesh very well with a number of attractions.
No, I'm not confusing anything. "Pirates," "jungle," and "island" are unique and separate themes, regardless of the exact setting. Yes, you can group them all together under an "adventure" theme (as Walt did), but that "theme" is extremely broad, and could fit just about anything (which is how we have come to get an archaeology-inspired attraction added to Adventureland in DL and a magic carpet ride added in MK.Polynesian birds, Caribbean pirates and a cruise through the jungle are a cohesive theme. I think you may be confusing setting for theme.
The queue is excellent and it does move (assuming all four theaters are operating). But it shouldn't be hitting 3 hours on average crowd days. Disney's recent history has seen underbuilt (from a capacity standpoint) rides going into the parks. I fear that Star Wars will face the same problems.
I also suspect that the don't distribute as many FP+ for FoP to help with the standby queue.
The Shanghai PotC tech would mesh very well with a number of attractions.
Save money and increase immersion: replace dolls with screens showing kids in doll costumes and makeup!IASW refurb confirmed!
Obviously the magic carpet ride is both aesthetically and thematically inappropriate but Indy is most certainly an adventure tale. Once again location certainly does not make for theme, although it intrinsically has aesthetic appeal. For example Star Wars I would deem an adventure type attraction but visually it may not fit.No, I'm not confusing anything. "Pirates," "jungle," and "island" are unique and separate themes, regardless of the exact setting. Yes, you can group them all together under an "adventure" theme (as Walt did), but that "theme" is extremely broad, and could fit just about anything (which is how we have come to get an archaeology-inspired attraction added to Adventureland in DL and a magic carpet ride added in MK.
(To reiterate, this is not to say that I don't like Adventureland. If the theming of every land were so rigid, Disney would be very limited in what types of attractions they could add to the parks.)
I can make this very simple.Obviously the magic carpet ride is both aesthetically and thematically inappropriate but Indy is most certainly an adventure tale. Once again location certainly does not make for theme, although it intrinsically has aesthetic appeal. For example Star Wars I would deem an adventure type attraction but visually it may not fit.
Just because the 3 attractions you bring up are in different locations does not mean they are not the same theme. Adventueland as a whole has one of the strongest successful theming in the MK.
AK has from the onset has kept to it's core values and theming more than any other park outside of the DisneySea. I would hate to see it deluded just because it's a visual match and/or can be massaged into the theme.
And BTW, "jungle", and "island" are certainly not themes, they are a location. It gets convoluted by the expression of the art. If you use a different medium it is easier to explain. If a filmmaker created 3 moves set on a desert island or a photographer decided to do a series on the tropics you may be quick to say this is their foray into an island theme. But if you dig deeper into the larger arc of the story, the setting is only the place where the artist can explore his/her thoughts on isolation or mans' connection to the rest of the world etc. Placesetting is used to externalize the theme not the context.
I'll leave this as my last post on this well. But no Africa is not the theme. The MK is unique(along with the front and back of Epcot), where they have separate lands with different themes. Africa/Asia etc. all have the same theme. Man's place in nature and the importance of conserving it's resources(flora and fauna). They just use design technics to showcase that theme in different parts of the world.I can make this very simple.
Your son is invited to an island-themed birthday party. You:
a) dress him up in a Hawaiian shirt and lei
b) dress him up in an eye patch and pirate hat
c) dress him up in big ears and an elephant trunk
d) refuse to let him go because "island" is not a theme
The correct answer is a.
If you choose b or c, your son will probably get made fun of and he will hate you. If you choose d, your son will probably have FOMO and he will hate you. If you don't want your son to hate you, please choose a.
In all seriousness, you are contradicting yourself. You claim that setting and theme are mutually exclusive, yet you praise AK for its theming. Is the theme of the Africa land in AK not Africa (which is a location)? The thing that connects Kilimanjaro Safaris, FOLK, and the Gorilla Falls Exploration Trail, for example, is that they all contain animals from the same location. We can probably agree that adding in an attraction about penguins would be a violation of theme, as penguins are not found in Africa. This is not to say that the words theme and setting are interchangeable - themes come in many forms and it's of course possible to have a theme that does not denote any type of location at all. However, I 100% stand by the assertion that a setting (i.e. a location and its associations) can be a theme. That is all I have to say on this matter and I will not be commenting further.
Do you insist a square is not a rectangle?I can make this very simple.
Your son is invited to an island-themed birthday party. You:
a) dress him up in a Hawaiian shirt and lei
b) dress him up in an eye patch and pirate hat
c) dress him up in big ears and an elephant trunk
d) refuse to let him go because "island" is not a theme
The correct answer is a.
If you choose b or c, your son will probably get made fun of and he will hate you. If you choose d, your son will probably have FOMO and he will hate you. If you don't want your son to hate you, please choose a.
In all seriousness, you are contradicting yourself. You claim that setting and theme are mutually exclusive, yet you praise AK for its theming. Is the theme of the Africa land in AK not Africa (which is a location)? The thing that connects Kilimanjaro Safaris, FOLK, and the Gorilla Falls Exploration Trail, for example, is that they all contain animals from the same location. We can probably agree that adding in an attraction about penguins would be a violation of theme, as penguins are not found in Africa. This is not to say that the words theme and setting are interchangeable - themes come in many forms and it's of course possible to have a theme that does not denote any type of location at all. However, I 100% stand by the assertion that a setting (i.e. a location and its associations) can be a theme. That is all I have to say on this matter and I will not be commenting further.
Shanghai's POTC tech is epic, but it would have to have a totally different approach than IJA.
Now, here's not to say that Shanghai's tech is one of the best on the planet, it is, but I think it would have to have a more EMV type upgrade to be similar to the frantic and 'high-stakes' IJA. They could go for a different type of ride which could still work great, but the ride itself has to be looked at completely differently than IJA.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.