Kman101
Well-Known Member
Guys, say what you want. But overall Indy fits the design aesthetic of Animal Kingdom. It wouldn't stick out there like it would at whatever Hollywood Studios will become. And if this project is a rush job to be open in time for the new film, it's the only option to bring Indy to Florida. Disney doesn't build big rides that quickly. Dinosaur would be an easy re-theme, most of the work would be on the facade and queue and tearing down a couple walls. The ride interior is all scenic design and those props can be built off-site and moved in very quickly. Plus who says the scenes would be identical to California's or Tokyo's? There's this great projection technology that was used in Shanghai that could replace or enhance scenes. The possibilities are endless.
Now, do I think it's a great idea? No. I'd miss Dinoland USA. But overall, it's not that bad for the park. Zootopia would be an awful horrendous fit for Animal Kingdom's design aesthetic, and overall theme as well. At least Indy keeps the feel of the park in tact. We're not in the days of more one-time-use only attractions, we are in the days of the franchise. Might as well call them Movie Franchise Parks instead of Theme Parks now (and I hate admitting that, but it seems to be true).
Put yourself in Bob Chapek's shoes. Your boss wants an Indy ride on the East Coast. What are you gonna do to have it open in time for the new movie? It makes sense.
Well said (not saying I agree with how they make their decisions but we keep fighting against things that are not in our control)
So many pages of hand-wringing and bickering and worry.
I'd rather Indy than Zootopia (I'd PREFER to keep Dinosaur but it is what it is)