Grimley1968
Well-Known Member
I've been trying to collect all the reasons I've gone from a WDW booster to skeptic. Sticking to resorts and leaving out the parks as much as possible for (relative) brevity:
1) Inside WDW Transportation. This is still probably the biggest reason IMO to stay on property. Being able to park your own car at the resort and "letting Disney do the driving" is a very nice perk. The addition of the Skyliner in the DHS/EPCOT was a well executed idea for the space it occupies.
2) MDE. I never used this because we're close enough to drive easily, but MDE had to be a major perk for those farther away who have to fly. Dropping complimentary MDE was a major mistake, IMO.
3) Theming. This was great at its peak, but with the increasing homogenization of even the deluxe resorts (even the Poly), there's less incentive to think of even the deluxe resorts as anything but a place to lay your head at night, aside from the easier transportation to the parks. With the encroachment of DVC at seemingly all the resorts, the individuality of the more expensive resorts is disappearing. These days you can save money by staying at Pop and having great transportation to EPCOT and DHS via Skyliner, versus staying at the Poly with its transportation to MK and EPCOT (assuming walking to the TTC to catch the EPCOT monorail). Why pay the extra to stay at Poly when I can get nearly the same accommodations at Pop with newer transportation, and can drive over to Poly if I really want to eat a Kona Cafe breakfast? Theming of the resorts, outside of maybe WL and AKL, really isn't much of a reason for the extra cost anymore, IMO.
4) Dining. I always enjoyed Boatwright's (is that still open?) at POR because it's quiet and the food was excellent without feeling the Disney bubble pressing on every one of my senses, Kona at the Poly, Whispering Canyon (love being able to see the WL lobby while eating) and some others, more so than dining in the parks. That's at least one incentive to stay at a more expensive onsite resort than Pop or All Stars, but it's not a major one, considering the options offsite for less money and probably just as good. For the values, that's a major disincentive to staying there, when most offsite hotels are usually within an easy drive of better dining.
5) Included parking. It's not a big thing in the grand scheme, but it was a perk that appealed to people within reasonable driving distance of WDW or flyers who wanted to rent a vehicle. Charging extra for resort parking, even if temporarily, left a really bad taste in my mouth and I don't have much conviction that they won't charge again in the future. But it's a great incentive for people to use WDW's transportation to the parks and should remain.
This only covers on site resorts (though by no means exhaustive), as parks' pros/cons are too complicated to add to this, but suffice it to say I'm not in the least a fan of the monetization of FP, for a bunch of reasons. But of the above onsite advantages listed, I'd say only #1 still applies fully, and #4 partially (even though there's no reason you can't come from offsite to dine at a resort). #2 and #3 no longer apply as advantages. #5 applies, for now. All that changes my recommendations to people who ask me these days.
1) Inside WDW Transportation. This is still probably the biggest reason IMO to stay on property. Being able to park your own car at the resort and "letting Disney do the driving" is a very nice perk. The addition of the Skyliner in the DHS/EPCOT was a well executed idea for the space it occupies.
2) MDE. I never used this because we're close enough to drive easily, but MDE had to be a major perk for those farther away who have to fly. Dropping complimentary MDE was a major mistake, IMO.
3) Theming. This was great at its peak, but with the increasing homogenization of even the deluxe resorts (even the Poly), there's less incentive to think of even the deluxe resorts as anything but a place to lay your head at night, aside from the easier transportation to the parks. With the encroachment of DVC at seemingly all the resorts, the individuality of the more expensive resorts is disappearing. These days you can save money by staying at Pop and having great transportation to EPCOT and DHS via Skyliner, versus staying at the Poly with its transportation to MK and EPCOT (assuming walking to the TTC to catch the EPCOT monorail). Why pay the extra to stay at Poly when I can get nearly the same accommodations at Pop with newer transportation, and can drive over to Poly if I really want to eat a Kona Cafe breakfast? Theming of the resorts, outside of maybe WL and AKL, really isn't much of a reason for the extra cost anymore, IMO.
4) Dining. I always enjoyed Boatwright's (is that still open?) at POR because it's quiet and the food was excellent without feeling the Disney bubble pressing on every one of my senses, Kona at the Poly, Whispering Canyon (love being able to see the WL lobby while eating) and some others, more so than dining in the parks. That's at least one incentive to stay at a more expensive onsite resort than Pop or All Stars, but it's not a major one, considering the options offsite for less money and probably just as good. For the values, that's a major disincentive to staying there, when most offsite hotels are usually within an easy drive of better dining.
5) Included parking. It's not a big thing in the grand scheme, but it was a perk that appealed to people within reasonable driving distance of WDW or flyers who wanted to rent a vehicle. Charging extra for resort parking, even if temporarily, left a really bad taste in my mouth and I don't have much conviction that they won't charge again in the future. But it's a great incentive for people to use WDW's transportation to the parks and should remain.
This only covers on site resorts (though by no means exhaustive), as parks' pros/cons are too complicated to add to this, but suffice it to say I'm not in the least a fan of the monetization of FP, for a bunch of reasons. But of the above onsite advantages listed, I'd say only #1 still applies fully, and #4 partially (even though there's no reason you can't come from offsite to dine at a resort). #2 and #3 no longer apply as advantages. #5 applies, for now. All that changes my recommendations to people who ask me these days.
Last edited: