solidyne
Well-Known Member
Plus, does subs even count as a dark ride?I said "pretty much ever," not "literally ever." The fact that you had to go back 12 years and cross over to the West Coast sort of proves my point.
Plus, does subs even count as a dark ride?I said "pretty much ever," not "literally ever." The fact that you had to go back 12 years and cross over to the West Coast sort of proves my point.
Actually, I'd love to see Zootopia in Animal. If Dinoland and Expedition Everest can be in this park than why not Zootopia? Sure people have said they are too human-like, but that can really be said about many Disney Animals.
Keeping any of the original Future Worlds as they were on opening day would have been a mistake. The park needed to evolve, but the piecemeal evolution with no long term plan has meant the park has been in a downward spiral since 1997.I don’t know how horizons would have aged... at some point it would have become pretty laughable. Sadly, that’s not where the future is headed.
World of Motion is a real shame, as it told the history of transportation (like spaceship earth). It should have never been replaced in my opinion, but rather test track could have been built around it.
Figment has survived so far, I’m guessing the play pavilion was a bullet that figment dodged... so I feel there is some hope. But we will see.
Unfortunately it's an approach they've taken in the past. Neglect something to the point where people will accept any replacement.Does that mean that the companies mistakes are an excuse not to make an amazing, original ride again?
I have yet to hear a story pitch for Zootopia from any fan that appropriately ties to Animal Kingdom's themes. For clarification here is what I'm referring to:Actually, I'd love to see Zootopia in Animal. If Dinoland and Expedition Everest can be in this park than why not Zootopia? Sure people have said they are too human-like, but that can really be said about many Disney Animals.
What about the Figment comics by Marvel?Let's not be sentimental about Figment, it's time to let go of that sinking ship. Sure he may sell some merch here and there, but many people in the world have never even heard of him.
I'm alright with IP's if it fits with the land and pavilions and "Inside Out" fits. It is way more relevant than Figment is nowadays. Disney just made a new ride, eateries and merch for it in DCA.
Besides Figment jumped the shark over a decade ago. It's time to let his little spark go out permanently.
I have yet to hear a story pitch for Zootopia from any fan that appropriately ties to Animal Kingdom's themes. For clarification here is what I'm referring to:
- The intrinsic and superior value of nature - this means that nature, above all else is at the forefront of the design. This leads to parts of the park being out of their true control (live animals, overgrown pathways, etc.).
- Transformation through adventure - this idea is that adventure changes people when they experience something they've never experienced before.
- Personal call to action - a sense of responsibility for the animals and the conservation message.
I dunno, it's pretty clear that real dinosaurs you go back in time for are the ones with the intrinsic and superior value over the ones at Chester and Hester's.Disney's Animal Kingdom: Experience the intrinsic and superior value of nature...and also DinoLand U.S.A.
Keeping any of the original Future Worlds as they were on opening day would have been a mistake. The park needed to evolve, but the piecemeal evolution with no long term plan has meant the park has been in a downward spiral since 1997.
I feel like the original figment and the world of motion would have passed the test of time quite well.
I'm not sure how to react to this but I think you are missing the point. The Original Imagination would still be held in the highest even today because of its ride system and mechanics. Nobody will argue that updates would be necessary along the way, but Figment still has a future (HUGE future) if Disney wanted him to. Imagination in its current state is regrettable, that has been known for years now.
I have yet to hear a story pitch for Zootopia from any fan that appropriately ties to Animal Kingdom's themes. For clarification here is what I'm referring to:
- The intrinsic and superior value of nature - this means that nature, above all else is at the forefront of the design. This leads to parts of the park being out of their true control (live animals, overgrown pathways, etc.).
- Transformation through adventure - this idea is that adventure changes people when they experience something they've never experienced before.
- Personal call to action - a sense of responsibility for the animals and the conservation message.
Let's not be sentimental about Figment, it's time to let go of that sinking ship. Sure he may sell some merch here and there, but many people in the world have never even heard of him.
I'm alright with IP's if it fits with the land and pavilions and "Inside Out" fits. It is way more relevant than Figment is nowadays. Disney just made a new ride, eateries and merch for it in DCA.
Besides Figment jumped the shark over a decade ago. It's time to let his little spark go out permanently.
I'm not missing the point, maybe you should read my posts more clearly. I said Disney is not going to bring back the original Figment. They are much more likely to put in a new IP that actually matters to the mainstream fans.
Hmm, yes you are missing point but I was mainly pointing out the absurdity of your original comments conventantly posted above. How is it that Figment still sells a ton of merch? How is it that my 8 year niece is obsessed with Figment? Not because he's on TV or in any movies she would she, but because of Epcot. Not everything has to be marketed for "the world" as you stated above, but Figment certainly has a strong presence at Epcot. You really think Figment "jumped the shark" a decade ago, so 2009? What is your point or reference or really proof of that? Hyperbole I suppose?
Let's not be sentimental about Figment, it's time to let go of that sinking ship. Sure he may sell some merch here and there, but many people in the world have never even heard of him.
Say it is the same exact ride format, but it has either "Inside Out" or "Figment" as its theming. Then who takes the Prize? The purple dragon that isn't as known or "Inside Out", a mega blockbuster hit, that will eventually spawn sequels?
Alright then let me float this question out there. Say Disney is trying to advertise to bring in new visitors to the parks. What would make families who've never gone to Disney World want to go?
A. a new Figment ride
or
B. a new Inside Out ride
Inside Out made $857.6 million and is the highest grossing nonsequel Pixar film ever.
Home
www.boxofficemojo.com
Like Song of the South and The Twilight Zone really damage their attractions.I'm not missing the point, maybe you should read my posts more clearly. I said Disney is not going to bring back the original Figment. They are much more likely to put in a new IP that actually matters to the mainstream fans.
Let me simplify it for you TJ. With my posts, many of which you didn't want to bring up because it went against your point.
Thanks, but I've moved on. Please read Martin and Kman's post above, there is nothing else more to discuss.Let me simplify it for you TJ. With my posts, many of which you didn't want to bring up because it went against your point.
They should honestly demo it and expand the pavilion.Any update on what’s going on with the Magic Eye Theatre? Getting demo’d? Getting saved? Inside Out (again)? Figment Show?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.