Epcot isn't Fantasyland.In this case I don't understand why using Inside Out is considered IPcot. Inside Out was created by Disney for Disney way after Disney purchased Pixar. It isn't even close as this isn't it a IP that was bought from someone else this is 100% Disney.
In my opinion this is no more than Walt Disney using Peter Pan, Snow White, and mr. Toad, in original Fantasyland. Never in the history of Disney Parks has every single attraction been an attraction that was unique and exclusive to that Park. Not everything is a jungle cruise a Pirates of the Caribbean or Haunted Mansion and it never has been. I'm completely fine with Disney using its own created intellectual properties inside or out of its own created parks. See what I did there
And weren't the complaints bad enough that Eisner came out to see what people didn't like? After that, he injected emergency money to halfway unscrew it up. That's how the rumor went at least.He was well-known for the general public back in the 80's and 90's. There was even a website that was dedicated to bringing back Figment when the second version of the attraction existed.
Surprised? Not exactly.. Were you surprised to not see the new country announced? The new attraction for UK? I cannot say I was stunned to not hear more, but a little surprised. My guess is we will not have to wait until D23 2019 to hear the rest of the 50th plans. . .
Thanks. Aware.Epcot isn't Fantasyland.
I imagine if Figment is removed from the ride he will basically become another Orange Bird with a nod here or there in the park few would ever notice and merchandise marketed to the hardcore fans.As long as Figment continues to have a presence at the park, I'd be fine with this. Inside Out totally works for the Imagination pavilion. As cute as Journey is, it is kinda... "Quaint" to put it nicely, compared to some other dark rides on property. Had I not experienced it as a child I'm not sure I'd be fond of it. That said I'd love if it got an update, filled it out a bit more.
Maybe replace the Pixar Movie Festival with a Figment "5"D show? As in, implement effects like AAs, come up with some new ones never been used at a Disney 3D show before. Could be cool.
Yes. The version we have now exists entirely because complaints were so bad Figment was shoehorned back in.And weren't the complaints bad enough that Eisner came out to see what people didn't like? After that, he injected emergency money to halfway unscrew it up. That's how the rumor went at least.
Conversely, the vast majority of the public would enjoy a well designed and executed ride using the 1982 IP. You know, like they used to have. And I mean vast.By what metric is this not a good move? The ride will be more popular in terms of attendance and satisfaction...it couldn't really get much worse. At the end of the day that's all that matters in determining whether or not it's a good move. So a few people on the internet care about too much IP in EPCOT, the vast majority of the public doesn't care, and I mean vast. And they'll be happy to see a new and innovative Inside Out attraction, which has a lot of potential as a concept..
Just bulldoze Epcot and get it over with Disney
Inside Out also fits. It's literally PART OF THE MOVIE
I have watched Inside Out several times and enjoy it immensely. Fantastic film that really touched me. And unlike other IPs, I can at least understand why some might feel it's appropriate for the park.
In terms of a ride however, the visuals portrayed onscreen aren't nearly as compelling in a ride format as the creative artistic and abstract designs seen in the original Imagination. But that's only one part of the problem with putting it in Imagination.
But there's also the mission statement of the experience. Inside Out is about emotion, and how emotion and memories connect and affect the way we lead our lives. Absolutely great concept in its own right and arguably an EPCOT worthy idea to explore, but Imagination isn't where it belongs. The Imaginationland portion of the movie is an exceedingly small part of the plot and creativity isn't the central point of the story. It's about emotion.
Journey Into Imagination's mission statement brilliantly fit with the rest of EPCOT Center. It could be called the "soul" of the park in fact. EPCOT sought to celebrate the progress we've made as a species. And Imagination explored the creative process behind that progress. Sparks of inspiration that drive creativity. Starting with abstract ideas in the first few scenes and exploring how we apply, expand and structure those sparks into creative endeavors such as literature and science. It's in the iconic lyrics-
One little spark, of inspiration
Is at the heart, of all creation
Right at the start, of everything that's new
One little spark, lights up for you
We all have sparks, imaginations
That's how our minds, create creations
For they can make, our wildest dreams come true
Those magic sparks, in me and you
While the loss of rides like World of Motion and Horizons was devastating, Imagination 1.0 being destroyed may well have been the most damaging. The park lost its soul. And honestly its loss speaks to a more sweeping problem that starting affecting Disney as a whole.
Yes back in the 80's and 90's. A family saving up for years and goes to WDW today would see Figment and likely respond with a shrug. I don't like it myself but that's just the way it is now.
Epcot isn't Fantasyland.
It wasn't a full takeover plan, just headquartering the Perry the Platypus World Showcase game in the old camera shop rather then Innoventions or that cart.There's concept art of it..But, it never happened...
Hey Figment was horrible in the original and what about Dreamfinder? I swear if you talk negative about him!
We need to distinguish our Figments. The original Figment in Imagination 1.0 was inquisitive and full of wonder. Figment in Imagination 3.0 is a menace.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.