The animatronics are pretty darn bad. Some of the worst ones are in it. The end of the ride with movies played like one huge TCM ad. We rode it in June and I admit, I won't miss it. It was pretty bad.
I do agree with this. It really just needed some extra TLC. IMHO, it would have been just wonderful if they just updated the ride with new AAs, movie scenes, etc. Gave it a new coat of paint, and made a grand re-opening...that would have been amazing!Somehow it always seemed the most dusty attraction. I mean that literally. It was coated in dust in places.
That scene is cute, but sadly it can be dependent on the CM as well. That is the only scene that was decent though. The rest? I'm honestly glad it's being redone into something else.You know the Wizard of Oz when you are on the Oz set ..... I can not help but smile every time
Though I do agree more articulated animatronics maybe 3d effects would have brought new life to the attraction.
They could do what ever they want to for the Micky Mouse thing by replacing the Fantansmic Scene
Too bad I will never see it again.
You know the Wizard of Oz when you are on the Oz set ..... I can not help but smile every time
Though I do agree more articulated animatronics maybe 3d effects would have brought new life to the attraction.
They could do what ever they want to for the Micky Mouse thing by replacing the Fantansmic Scene
Too bad I will never see it again.
So let me see if I have this straight. You ask a direct question. And then before you allow anyone even a second to offer a response and perhaps even give a rationale in support of that response, you proclaim that you flatly reject the response. Okay, gotcha.I keep seeing folks call The Great Movie Ride "dated" over and over. How is it dated? And before anyone says it's because the movies are old, I flat out reject that. The most recently opened and most popular ride in Magic Kingdom is based entirely on an 80 year old movie. Is 7Dwarfs Mine Train "dated"?
Please enlighten me.So let me see if I have this straight. You ask a direct question. And then before you allow anyone even a second to offer a response and perhaps even give a rationale in support of that response, you proclaim that you flatly reject the response. Okay, gotcha.
If you have any other questions that you don't want any of us to answer, please let us know.
Not gonna lie though, I really did like Dreamflight. I like Buzz better though. So there's that.If the new attraction is way better than GMR, we'll get over it fairly quickly. For example, not too many people wish Buzz Lightyear would close so Dreamflight could re-open.
Still, the problem is GMR was a classic attraction and in many ways was the heart & soul of the park. So... I dunno. This new attraction had better be awesome.
Not sure you can compare the two. Alien encounter didn't have 'mass appeal' due to how scary it was. Not meant for a family as a whole. GMR had the ability to be a family ride, but it bore many while others loved it.I liken the GMR to Alien Encounter in a way. They're both beloved but truly only ever achieved Cult-like status never mass appeal. I enjoyed both but not surprised or disappointed they were ultimately replaced. Both probably could have stood the test of time given either cosmetic changes or script changes but in GMR's case I think it had a good run considering. I'm generally opposed to change but in this instance I can accept it and welcome the new. That said; I do miss my AE attraction something ridiculous.
This is 100% correct .. MGM needs more rides .. it doesn't need to "swap them out".It's just a bad decision. Not because the Mickey ride will be bad, but because they could have easily kept it, updated it, AND built the Mickey ride.
Not like DHS doesn't need more rides, even after Star Wars and Toy Story.
It was a missed opportunity to give a classic icon the respect it deserves. Instead, they just killed it.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.