Is this considered good theme park design? I mean, yes it gives us a pretty lake and and expansive view, but it is what I would call a "Committed Path." Same thing I dislike about Islands of Adventure. Your options are basically clockwise or conter-clockwise. Very rigid, very linear approach to theme park layout. Far worse with the introduction of Fast-Pass as one is often needing to criss-cross a park.
WS? To me it counts as great design! WS is not meant to be criss-crossed, but savoured. The individual pavilion gains in meaning through other pavilions. All different, all the same, a sort of Small World effect, but on a WDW scale.
That’s the idea. Then you decide you can’t do it all in one day so come back again.
The lagoon sinkhole was a happy accidental discovery. Almost.
Going off Mister Penguins earlier observations I guess I’d add a third layout option called “lost expedition.”
The only WEDway for the park as built was in Futureworld.
I've heard that before, you're not the only one.
The WEDWay around Showcase is from when that was a separate park, located next to the TTC.
There's an amusing, albeit inappropriate meme about the New York street grid vs. the Boston street configuration. That's essentially DHS.
If they wanted to it wouldn't be difficult to make another loop connecting Animation Courtyard and the RnRC area.
I still think this should happen.
