jdmdisney99
Well-Known Member
Lucas Land.
Walt Disney World as a whole has become stale because there is no risk taking. The identity crisis at the Disney-MGM Studios is because of that same aversion to risk taking. The park has become a place to toss brands because the brand "needs" a place in the parks. I would think now, more than ever, a truly groundbreaking project that helps to reinforce whatever identity the park is to have is needed. Not one that only furthers the tossing in of known brands.
I agree, although we will definitely hit it one last time next month. I believe it will be our last chance.I only did LMA once and never again. It's just cars driving around and around and around and around and occasionally there's a cool explosion. Indy's a lot more interesting
I agree, although we will definitely hit it one last time next month. I believe it will be our last chance.
I may even rearrange our last park day November 17 to catch the Backlot Tour one last time too.
Unlike some doubters, I believe the various insiders here who truly believe Cars land (at least) is coming. The Monsters Inc. Coaster, and anything else they want to throw DHS' way will all just be a bonus!
Hollywood/Suset Blvd, Animation Studios, Pixar Studios, Muppets Studios, Lucas Land, then way down the road, the potential for Marvel Studios.
I don't know exactly where it could fit, but I think a "Toon Town" area would also be a good addition. It's been rumored in the past for DHS and with the loss of Toon Town Fair in MK, it would be an option. I think it could work well as a place themed to "where cartoons work" (as opposed to Cali where they where they live more or less).
p.s. would be a great place to re-add Mr. Toad if they ever wanted to do that.
I think you are simplifying the issues of the park's identity. Removing the Hat doe snot just automatically fix Hollywood Blvd, as other aspects have still be lost such as the street not being just another World of Disney.The identity crisis at DHS revolves around a few things. The hat, the lack of cohesive lands, the lack of attractions, and the staleness of the existing attractions. If the hat is removed, then Hollywood Blvd and the golden age of hollywood theme will be restroed. And at least to me, it will make a lot more sense thematic wise when entering the park.
I think adding Cars land and monster's inc into Pixar Place while replacing LMA and the Backlot unifies the area in the back left corner of the park, creating a cohesive land. Having a variety of Pixar brands in the Pixar Studios element of the park establishes the area much better than simply having TSMM as the only attraction in the "land." Then if rumors are true, after phase 1, Star Wars and Indy are potentially looking at expansions/revamps which should again, unify the Lucas Land area of the park. Then the stale aspect will be addressed with the removal of TLM and BatB shows, as their stories are being told in NFL.
Well, according to the DisneyParks app, the backlot tour is "Closed for refurbishment". Could this be the hint that we are searching for, for a DHS expansion?
Fair point.I think you are simplifying the issues of the park's identity. Removing the Hat doe snot just automatically fix Hollywood Blvd, as other aspects have still be lost such as the street not being just another World of Disney.
I also do not see Pixar Place as a cohesive idea. Where in the Pixar films, excepting for some small easter eggs that are common to them all, is there the suggestion that this occurs in the same or even similar universe? The approach right now is the same one that plagues the Studio park concept, that these are creations of a company that are tossed together because of their common ownership/creation, not because of their commons stories. It is the worst of the Universal Studios model, brands just slapped together because they are all films.
New shows also do not address the experiential reasoning for the shows. Are they merely shows based on other properties under the Disney family of brands, or is there something more to their placement?
I think you are simplifying the issues of the park's identity. Removing the Hat doe snot just automatically fix Hollywood Blvd, as other aspects have still be lost such as the street not being just another World of Disney.
I also do not see Pixar Place as a cohesive idea. Where in the Pixar films, excepting for some small easter eggs that are common to them all, is there the suggestion that this occurs in the same or even similar universe? The approach right now is the same one that plagues the Studio park concept, that these are creations of a company that are tossed together because of their common ownership/creation, not because of their commons stories. It is the worst of the Universal Studios model, brands just slapped together because they are all films.
New shows also do not address the experiential reasoning for the shows. Are they merely shows based on other properties under the Disney family of brands, or is there something more to their placement?
I think you are simplifying the issues of the park's identity. Removing the Hat doe snot just automatically fix Hollywood Blvd, as other aspects have still be lost such as the street not being just another World of Disney.
I also do not see Pixar Place as a cohesive idea. Where in the Pixar films, excepting for some small easter eggs that are common to them all, is there the suggestion that this occurs in the same or even similar universe? The approach right now is the same one that plagues the Studio park concept, that these are creations of a company that are tossed together because of their common ownership/creation, not because of their commons stories. It is the worst of the Universal Studios model, brands just slapped together because they are all films.
Islands of Adventure is not the same because each property has its own distinct land. That is not the case with Pixar Place where it is everything and anything that is done by Pixar. Where dinosaurs and talking cars and toys all come together not because of any commonalities within their stories, but because the same word appears in their opening credits. It is a strategy that leads to the disjointed nature of Studio-based theme parks. The focus shifts from creating an experiential environment to representing films from the studio in question. Why is Twister: Ride It Out in New York? Because it is a studio park and Twister is a film.I disagree that in a land, especially one based off a studio such as Pixar, that everything in the land has to tell the same common story. Fantasyland is a combination of serveral different stories that don't relate to one another whatsoever. It's not a matter of the easter eggs in Pixar films that connects them together, it's the concept that they all come from the same studio origin.
If brands slapped together because they are films is bad, then IoA should have never added Harry Potter to their laundry list of brands like Shrek, Mummy, Spiderman, Hulk, Dr. Suess, Transformers, etc. Unless you are looking for Pixar Studios to only represent one of their brands, such as Toy Story Playland, A Bug's Land, The Seas with Nemo, or Cars land, then I don't see the issue with having Pixar Studios show off their variety of storytelling.
Pixar Place is designed in part after the Pixar campus, but then their are the few Monstropolis elements that anticipated the Monsters, Inc. attraction. And then why does the Pixar campus have giant toys everywhere and a over-scaled version of Andy's bedroom? Why would they also have part of Monstropolis built? If Cars Land is included, then why do they have a full scale recreation of Radiator Springs? At Universal Studios Hollywood this makes sense as the sets and pieces are actual artifacts of the film making process. Pixar does not use sets, it is all digital animation. All I see in Pixar Place is some weird construct of a place that might make sense if this was a place where these films were filmed.Isn't the story for Pixar Place that you are at the actual Pixar Studios, not that you are going into the universes of the films? Not saying that I think that it is a good story, just that that is what I thought I read, and is why I was wondering whether we would be getting RSR built behind a soundstage to fit with the area!
I was readin the DPB and noticed this comment on the article. Seems legit. Scroll down to the comments section. it's the first comment.
http://disneyparks.disney.go.com/bl...w-five-night-vacation-package-offer-and-save/
We had Jim Hill on last week (the show hasn't been released yet), and we discussed a Lucas Land possibility. Evidently the hold up is Disney trying to buy the intellectual property outright. It would allow for a lot more flexibility, as such they could leave the Echo Lake area alone for now and focus on other areas for enhancement knowing that a Lucas Land can stand the test of time.Lucas Land.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.