Buried20KLeague said:
I can kinda see your point here. But the problem I still have is this:
Why is the bride currently in the attic at WDW????
There's currently no reason for it. So here we have an attic, with some pop up heads on sticks, along with annoying screams... A total carnival effect. I can't comprehend why any Disney fan wouldn't trade in this attic for what Disneyland has: Disney quality effects that create a cohesive story line. Don't forget, not only did they update their bride, but they added potraits of her with husbands... Who's heads disappear as you pass them!!
How would that not be far superior than the pop-up heads and bride (that currently serves no purpose) that WDW has?
I get the whole "disney purist" thing, too. But geez. There's gotta be a limit.
Not talking about you, SilentWindODoom... :wave: Just tossing that in to this post.
Hehe, for a second there, I thought you were talking about me. Anyway, the Bride is a central figure in the mansion because she seems to important. There is no official clear reason for her being there, and it is not needed because everyone makes their own. However, one can certainly see something tragic about her, and the way she stands there, heart beating, with a candle in the dark. Now she's become an axe murderer.
On the subject of the heartbeat, I didn't notice, but is it gone? I certainly didn't see the vivid sight of the beating within her chest.
Since1976 said:
I wouldn't mind a refurb of the bride like in CA. I just experienced that attraction a couple of weeks ago, and I found the effect of that entire attic area unsettling -- in a good way.
I haven't ridden WDW's HM since 2002 (it was closed for the previously mentioned refurb in 2005), but does anyone else agree with me that DL's version is superior?
Just curious. Are you saying that the version of the attic is better, or that the entire Disneyland Haunted Mansion is better?
STR8FAN2005 said:
How is a 30 second scene of a much longer attraction take the focus of the whole attraction? How is it any different than the seance scene? Also, if there is no story to HM, why is there a corpse hanging in the stretching room?
Just curious.
First of all, we need look no further than the Mice Age article which mentioned this. It states that the new additions make it so that the Master Gracey storyline is gone and the new storyline is that the Bride owns the mansion and has been luring in suitors only to kill them, and I have no doubts that there are others that do and will think this. It seems that to people outside, this does change the focus of the whole attraction
Also, the hanging corpse is just a little morbid joke, like that only way out is to hang yourself. I do wish it could be changed in some way so that you can more easily see the corpse and realize what it is. It can be lost on some. It is only part of the storyline to those who make it a part.
Lewis Carroll said:
I agree its because of these moronic purists who want everything to stay as a muesuem that give people like me a bad name. Now when I say the original Imagination was a superior attraction to whats currently there or that Alien Encounter was better than Stitch people quickly try to pin the "purist" tag on me. I want Disney to continue to improve and change..but I want the changes and upgrades to be BETTER than what its replacing. In the case of what they are doing with the Mansion in california these changes make the ride better(although the brides cross-eyed face looks stupid) and I hope even more changes are on the way to both the DL and WDW version of this stale old now unscary attraction.
I'm surprised. I would think that those who prefer Alien Encounter would be called Disney Radicals (did I just coin a new term, or is that used already?). A Disney Purist would want the ride replaced by Stitch, as it is more for the children, not mean spirited in the least, and is "what Walt would have wanted".
I agree with you about the Bride's face. The pictures of her make her look rediculous, like a Carol Burnette character in the midst of a wild take. Yes, I know I shouldn't judge on a picture, but I would like pictures of the Bride on my computer, and I wouldn't want the Bride looking like that in a picture.
Also, as to it being unscary, I think creepy and eerie is what we're looking for here, not scary. The HM is not supposed to be a scary attraction, and I hope the heads remain the most outright frightening part. Instead, I'd rather the mansion become more eerie and unsettling, dark and mysterious, as Claude Coates did such a wonderful job. Please, no Carnotaurs popping out. I don't know if that's what you meant by scary, but just figured I'd throw that out if, in fact, you meant scary as I thought you did. Forgive me if you didn't.
And, finally PLEASE don't let them cheapen the ride with a gift shop in the end. Oh, can't they just put it off the grounds in the Keelboats building?